Another assassination attempt
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2024 10:53 pm
Mariner Talk Chat Forum
Seattle Mariners & Seahawks Chat Forum
https://marinertalk.com/
Another assassination attempt
Page 1 of 6
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:47 pm
His X account has an email that when you web search it leads to a pro-Ukraine website that he apparently runs. See the matching emails-
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:48 pm
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 4:22 am
Seems a disenfranchised former Trump supporter with mentally ill tendencies that backed Haley, Tulsi and Vivek against Trump and supported Ukraine in the war effort.
You'd love him BPJ... he def wasn't a fan of Jewish people and was very anti-vax.
Perhaps keeping AK-47's out of the hands of insane people like this is a good idea?
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:01 am
Lol.
He's just a Trump-hating loon like you.
Trump didn't support his pet project Ukraine, so the guy tried to go kill him.
Whackjob Ukraine supporter.
Just a mirror-image of the whackjob Israel supporters. Retards on both sides.
He's just a Trump-hating loon like you.
Trump didn't support his pet project Ukraine, so the guy tried to go kill him.
Whackjob Ukraine supporter.
Just a mirror-image of the whackjob Israel supporters. Retards on both sides.
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:06 pm
So ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.
But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)
But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:09 pm
I don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.gil wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:06 pmSo ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.
But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)
Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.
I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:17 pm
BGG? Nice ring to it!Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:09 pmI don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.gil wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:06 pmSo ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.
But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)
Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.
I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.
I don't think that's accurate, but how do I convince you otherwise? I believe in rights to speech, weapons (within limits), and reproductive choice. I think the government should get involved to make things "orderly": things like public safety, protecting consumers and employees, and letting markets work (i.e, thwarting monopoly power).
And yes, government should get involved in throwing any possible change against some asshole who plans to assassinate Trump! Let's see if the existing laws take care of him. If they don't, I'm open to considering new laws. But right now, I don't know what you can do about someone who *might have* shot at Trump if his gun was owned legally and he acted alone.
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 8:50 pm
Yes, you claim all these things, but when it get's down to it, you are no better than SoB with your political views.....:gil wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:17 pmBGG? Nice ring to it!Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:09 pmI don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.gil wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:06 pmSo ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.
But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)
Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.
I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.
I don't think that's accurate, but how do I convince you otherwise? I believe in rights to speech, weapons (within limits), and reproductive choice. I think the government should get involved to make things "orderly": things like public safety, protecting consumers and employees, and letting markets work (i.e, thwarting monopoly power).
And yes, government should get involved in throwing any possible change against some asshole who plans to assassinate Trump! Let's see if the existing laws take care of him. If they don't, I'm open to considering new laws. But right now, I don't know what you can do about someone who *might have* shot at Trump if his gun was owned legally and he acted alone.
Government
Government
Government
Re: Another assassination attempt
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2024 8:51 pm
An I think it's kind of funny that you say you want government to be involved with so many things, but not abortion.
