Mike's Mail Bag

Post Reply
User avatar
D-train
Posts: 43711
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Mike's Mail Bag

Post by D-train » Fri Jun 03, 2022 4:32 pm

I am going to try to get more into this season since we now no longer have and idiot for a HC.
By Mike Vorel
Seattle Times staff reporter
Two months from now, Washington will embark on its first fall camp of the Kalen DeBoer Era.

(Hopefully by then, it’ll finally feel like summer in Seattle.)

But, while fans continue to bide their time, let’s sort through another edition of the UW football mailbag.


Assessing UW’s 2022 schedule, the Huskies have three games they absolutely should win (Kent State, Portland State and Arizona at home), seven games they could realistically win (Stanford, UCLA, Arizona State, Cal, Oregon State, Colorado and Washington State), and two games they probably won’t win (home against Michigan State and on the road at Oregon).

Let’s say UW takes care of the gimmes and wins four of the seven debatable conference contests. That’d get Kalen DeBoer’s crew to six wins and bowl eligibility.

So let’s put the over/under on Washington’s 2022 victories at 6.5.

That may look like a lukewarm figure. But this team is talented enough — if the pieces fit, the systems fit, the coaches fit, everything fits and the Huskies stay healthy — to win nine or 10 games, in what would amount to a dazzling DeBoer debut.

Of course, there’s also a less rosy (and more unrealistic) scenario in which UW again fails to run the ball or stop the run, loses the turnover battle (-0.58 turnover margin in 2021, 10th in the Pac-12) and suffers from inconsistent quarterback play … producing an unappetizing sequel to the 2021 season.

ADVERTISING
Skip Ad

Skip Ad

Skip Ad

With ample talent, questionable depth at certain spots and a new coaching staff, UW has perhaps the widest distance between ceiling and floor in the Pac-12 Conference. Seven wins would be satisfactory. Eight or more would qualify as a successful season.


The answer here is a resounding no.

Beyond Huard’s lifelong ties and affinity for the program, let’s remember that junior Indiana transfer Michael Penix Jr. — the favorite to start against Kent State on Sept. 3 — has never lasted more than six games in a season. There are countless cliches about quarterbacks being one play away from starting, but that scenario is especially relevant in Seattle this fall.

Granted, in the transfer portal era, a patient backup quarterback basically qualifies as an oxymoron. But with four full seasons of eligibility remaining, and a quarterback-friendly system installed this spring, I doubt Huard would give up on a lifelong dream after barely a year on campus.

(Of course, if he spends his entire redshirt freshman season stashed behind both Penix and Dylan Morris, that patience may go kaput.)


First thing’s first: in the current college football climate, you can never totally discount the possibility of a quarterback transferring into or out of a program.

But … with that said, UW is not in a position where it desperately needs to add another quarterback this offseason or next. The Huskies will almost certainly sign a high school quarterback in the 2023 cycle — whether it’s four-star Avery Johnson, three-star Aidan Chiles, three-star Lincoln Kienholz, or someone else entirely. Plus, their three existing scholarship signal callers — Penix (two seasons), Morris (three seasons) and Huard (four seasons) — each have multiple years of remaining eligibility.

ADVERTISING
Skip Ad

Now, if Morris or Huard ultimately enter the transfer portal, UW would certainly seek to replace that experience … and it’s possible DeBoer and offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach Ryan Grubb could access the portal if they’re underwhelmed by the talent at that particular position. But purely from a numbers standpoint, there isn’t a gaping hole at quarterback (as it stands) that needs to be filled.


This is a difficult thing to quantify, so here’s what I did: I took the 13 programs who have appeared in the College Football Playoff, and I calculated their winning percentages since 2014, to identify the team with the widest variance in the CFP era.

Here are the results:

Alabama (7 CFP appearances): 104-10 (.912)

Ohio State (4 CFP appearances): 94-11 (.895)

Clemson (6 CFP appearances): 99-13 (.884)

Oklahoma (4 CFP appearances): 86-19 (.819)

Georgia (2 CFP appearances): 86-21 (.804)

Notre Dame (2 CFP appearances): 76-26 (.745)

LSU: 70-31 (.693)

Michigan: 66-31 (.680)

Cincinnati: 68-33 (.673)

Oregon: 68-33 (.673)

Michigan State: 63-35 (.643)

Washington: 62-35 (.639)

Florida State: 59-40 (.596)

Florida State is pretty clearly the team with the widest variance in the CFP era, while Washington finishes next in line. Of the 13 CFP participants, eight have had a losing season since 2014. The worst seasons were turned in by Michigan State (3-9 in 2016, 2-5 in 2020), UW (4-8 in 2021), Notre Dame (4-8 in 2016), Oregon (4-8 in 2016), Florida State (3-6 in 2020, currently with four consecutive losing seasons), Michigan (2-4 in 2020) and Cincinnati (4-8 in 2016 and 2017).

Sign up for Fan Fix
Your dose of local sports news. Delivered Monday through Friday.

(The most consistent — not best — team in this span may be Oklahoma, which has lost exactly two games in seven consecutive seasons.)

Outside of the nearly untouchable elite, it’s hard to win. It’s harder to keep winning.


Unless Vita Vea walks back through that door, junior defensive lineman (and converted offensive lineman) Ulumoo “MJ” Ale — a 6-foot-6, 344-pound battering ram with attached biceps — is the obvious answer.
dt

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Walla Walla Washington

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Fri Jun 03, 2022 4:36 pm

I am going to try to get more into this season since we now no longer have and idiot for a HC.
Can you please post a link to support your claim?

:lol:

User avatar
AZOldDawg
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 1:51 am
Location: Surprise, Arizona

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by AZOldDawg » Sat Jun 18, 2022 2:47 pm

Hey Darren. Tell Mama to watch "The Old Man" on fx. I think her dogs are the stars of the show.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 43711
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by D-train » Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:18 pm

AZOldDawg wrote:
Sat Jun 18, 2022 2:47 pm
Hey Darren. Tell Mama to watch "The Old Man" on fx. I think her dogs are the stars of the show.
Will do! I love Jeff Bridges so something in it for me too. Thanks Chuck!
dt

User avatar
AZOldDawg
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 1:51 am
Location: Surprise, Arizona

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by AZOldDawg » Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:04 pm

I once had a password called "BiggerLebowski"

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 43711
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by D-train » Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:50 pm

dt

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Walla Walla Washington

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:25 pm

Wow a little good news.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 43711
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by D-train » Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:45 pm

Walla Walla Dawg II wrote:
Fri Jun 24, 2022 11:25 pm
Wow a little good news.
Yeah I find it a little odd that in this Space age we live in recruiting a guy in the far away galaxy known as Texas is a big deal. If we are going to run with the big dogs we can't give a F about recruiting in SEC territory.
dt

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 7780
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sat Jun 25, 2022 6:19 pm

Seems like they've recruited a number of highly rated D linemen over the past several years going pack to CP and very few of them have panned out.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 43711
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Mike's Mail Bag

Post by D-train » Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:11 pm

dt

Post Reply