All offseason people were saying that hey said they were going to add one. Also, how did Jerry "not follow through" with something he never said he was going to do in the first place? That makes no sense unless the implication was that he was going to add someone?bpj wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:27 amAgreed, but you were the only one saying that anybody said he guaranteed he'd get a #2.Juliooooo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 3:17 amAlso I didn't say he wasn't going after one, he never said he was going to get one though. There is a difference. A big one, that isn't "just semantics."bpj wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 2:51 amIt was right after you tried disagreeing with me that Dipoto said he was going after a #2.
Dtrain already said he was responding to my statement that you were trying to refute, and he posted a quote supporting it. Then you go off about it not being a guarantee, which nobody ever claimed it was- before you interjected it.
Nobody else did. That's what I mean you were arguing with yourself because you're the only one that introduced the idea that Dipoto guaranteed we'd get a #2, apparently based on other things you've read people say.
Dtrain clarified twice he was responding to what I said about "going after" one, but you kept pushing the argument that you introduced (that nobody else was even saying)- that being that Dipoto said he was going to get a #2.
Nobody said that but you. Then you started arguing about it for some reason.
And I'm clarifying my point, or an I not allowed to do that. I said"Jerry never said he was going to add anyone". DT replied with a post that he thought contradicted that statement. Why is he able to clarify, and when I do I'm just "arguing"?