Now 6 and 6 and 7 and 5 is good enough but Pete wasn't? Dude. Take a look at the Rose Bowl team, the difference makers, and remember who recruited Tua. Take a look at the amount of Juniors and Seniors on that team. Then take a look at the years after.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 2:10 pmLet's take a look at Slick Rick:
The year after he became head coach to his "retirement":
1998 Lambo's last season he had a 6-6 record and lost in the Oahu Classic
1999 Rick's first season he had a 7-5 record and lost in the Holiday Bowl [this is what he did with Lambo's recruits]
2000 Rich had a 11-1 season and won the Rose Bowl - two years removed from Lambo
2001 a 8-4 record and lost the Holiday Bowl
2002 a 7-6 record and lost the Sun Bowl
2003 coach was Gilbertson
Honestly, it seems both Rick and Peterson were pretty similar in records and bowl outcomes. But Rick actually won a big bowl, whereas Peterson never did.
So although it is not incorrect to say he won with Lambo's recruits, he also had his own. But it's safe to say the recruits didn't matter because that entire season was won because of Matt Tuiasospo at QB. Tuiasospo was going to go to UW no matter who the coach was (his parents went to UW and local kid).
You really crack me up. Pete wasn't good enough, but only once did he win fewer than 8 games. Rick won 8 once and 11 once. Otherwise? Pete was never 6 and 6. You actually posted that win loss record as a reason he was better than Pete? I don't get you. You really are an odd duck.
Ok, fine, some guy that coached before my dad was alive won a lot of games. My bad. Throw Dobie in all you want, I don't give a shit. But Slick Rick? Fuck that.