OT: Should Aurora Be Reinstated

[douche]

I agree, this is too much: "Gil is a classic example of the weak minded who sit around watching CNN and blindly accept their narratives as reality"

Sounds like aurora won't be back.

[D-train]

Again this is NOT about shutting down alternate views. I have NEVER even considered banning Gil because of his views. He is a good person that deserves to be heard as opposed to belittled.

Does AA respond to posts any different than Michael? I have never seen AA miss-quote someone then go on a tirade about it....but Michael does.

Michael definitely goes on tirades but I see at as more of an escalation and it takes two to Tango situation. He never comes in hot out of the blue that I have seen.

AA will see an opinion he doesn't like and just come in guns blazing out of the blue with no intention of having a debate but just trying to slam people.

I have disagreed and debated with Donn Beach 57 million times but if he would have disagreed with me he would have said something like:

I really don't see the relevance of that incident, he hasn't even been charged yet and given it has gone on this long I wouldn't be surprised if it was dropped. Non issue and shouldn't impact football decisions. I think you are probably making too big a deal out of it.

Instead AA accuses me off being a Moral High grounder whatever the F that means and that I am just CRAZY to even bring it up.

See the difference?????

[Donn Beach]

You banned Aurora for accusing you of being a moral high grounder?

[D-train]

So this is about insults? Sorry but I find that hilarious. Talk about being politically correct. You need a safe place because someone talked mean to you?

So not being a complete dick for no reason is politically correct??? Sorry I don't think you know what that means. Yes, this forum will be "safe" aka free from assholes and social invalids.

[D-train]

You banned Aurora for accusing you of being a moral high grounder?

Wow, try to keep up. That was an example of what an irrational overheated lunatic he is. Yeah pretty f-ing insane to accuse me of that, I agree!! lol

[Donn Beach]

Honestly I can't begin to wrap my brain around banning aurora. Was he a lunatic? Sure, I couldn't begin to follow some of his arguments but they were entertaining

[maoling]

btw here is a little sneak preview of how this vote will likely turn out once it closes this afternoon....

Sincerely D Train (aka nurse Wratchet)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGAaP9WthQo

Who made the decision to close the vote after 24 hours? Some people don't show up here every day. It would be fair to leave the voting open for a couple three days to give everyone a chance to vote.

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

You banned Aurora for accusing you of being a moral high grounder?

Wow, try to keep up. That was an example of what an irrational overheated lunatic he is. Yeah pretty f-ing insane to accuse me of that, I agree!! lol

I found this to be phucking funny....sorry, it's at your expense, but still funny.
[as soon as you posted this, I was wondering if Donn was going to post something]

Just because Donn posted that, couldn't' that be considered trolling you? He knew what you meant, but had to rub a little salt in the wound anyway.

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

Again this is NOT about shutting down alternate views. I have NEVER even considered banning Gil because of his views. He is a good person that deserves to be heard as opposed to belittled.

Does AA respond to posts any different than Michael? I have never seen AA miss-quote someone then go on a tirade about it....but Michael does.

Michael definitely goes on tirades but I see at as more of an escalation and it takes two to Tango situation. He never comes in hot out of the blue that I have seen.

AA will see an opinion he doesn't like and just come in guns blazing out of the blue with no intention of having a debate but just trying to slam people.

I have disagreed and debated with Donn Beach 57 million times but if he would have disagreed with me he would have said something like:

I really don't see the relevance of that incident, he hasn't even been charged yet and given it has gone on this long I wouldn't be surprised if it was dropped. Non issue and shouldn't impact football decisions. I think you are probably making too big a deal out of it.

Instead AA accuses me off being a Moral High grounder whatever the F that means and that I am just CRAZY to even bring it up.

See the difference?????

I do see what you are saying, but don't necessarily agree.

AA is a very smart person, that does explain himself quite well. Gil and others just rub him wrong and the tirade begins. I've called him out on it before, but never saw a reason to ban him.

Gil also sets himself up for a lot of this crap. Even though he denies it, he did say that (since you brought it up) President Trump grabbing for the wheel was disturbing (if I remember that properly). That is proof he had an opinion. Later after myself and AA commented on it, he denied it.

It's all board bullshit my friend....let him back. And from now on, you will be known as a "Moral High-grounder".


I truly want to meet both you and AA, for no other reason to see if your online personality is the same as your real personality.

[D-train]

You banned Aurora for accusing you of being a moral high grounder?

Wow, try to keep up. That was an example of what an irrational overheated lunatic he is. Yeah pretty f-ing insane to accuse me of that, I agree!! lol

I found this to be phucking funny....sorry, it's at your expense, but still funny.
[as soon as you posted this, I was wondering if Donn was going to post something]

Just because Donn posted that, couldn't' that be considered trolling you? He knew what you meant, but had to rub a little salt in the wound anyway.

That's his style and I am cool with it. I have given him thousands of similar non mean spirited jabs over the years. I am not thin skinned. I literally have zero issues with any other poster on this entire website.