Missing Titanic Submersible
Missing Titanic Submersible
I'll be amazed if anyone survives whatever has happened to it. Hope they get lucky, but I think somehow it got entangled down there, or some sea critter hit it and compromised the hull.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/other/ ... r-AA1cLKZw
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/other/ ... r-AA1cLKZw
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12901
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
That's a lot of pressure they are under. Prayers they get back O.K.maoling wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 12:56 amI'll be amazed if anyone survives whatever has happened to it. Hope they get lucky, but I think somehow it got entangled down there, or some sea critter hit it and compromised the hull.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/other/ ... r-AA1cLKZw
The article says 8 hours on average to decompress and get back to the surface. Crazy.
I've been down 160 feet scuba diving and realizing I don't need or want to go any deeper than that ever in the ocean.
I got scared because we were always taught to stay within the 130 feet depth range but the water was so clear and deceptive.
Granted I was with a Marine Biologist who's crew knew exactly what they were doing so it was my best dive ever.
They most likely if surviving will spend days in a decompression tank with hopefully no long term lung/brain damage.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
I never dove much deeper than 60 feet with tanks around here in 70s. Redondo, Edmonds, local stuff. Found an octopus once!
My guess is that repeated dives at that extreme depth to the wreck, even if it was just a few, may have weakened the hull to a point that it just ruptured and crumpled this time, despite whatever failsafe systems they had in place. Communication appears to have been lost suddenly and abruptly, without a word or ping since. That speaks to disaster.
My guess is that repeated dives at that extreme depth to the wreck, even if it was just a few, may have weakened the hull to a point that it just ruptured and crumpled this time, despite whatever failsafe systems they had in place. Communication appears to have been lost suddenly and abruptly, without a word or ping since. That speaks to disaster.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12901
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
That is nuts and horrible way to die.maoling wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:46 amI never dove much deeper than 60 feet with tanks around here in 70s. Redondo, Edmonds, local stuff. Found an octopus once!
My guess is that repeated dives at that extreme depth to the wreck, even if it was just a few, may have weakened the hull to a point that it just ruptured and crumpled this time, despite whatever failsafe systems they had in place. Communication appears to have been lost suddenly and abruptly, without a word or ping since. That speaks to disaster.
As a kid I dove off of Redondo too. Cold as hell and murky/low visibility. Nothing like the Carribean bro.
Honestly the older I get the more I like to just snorkel. I've seen some of the best marine life water chest high and 50 meters out.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
As a kid I dove off of Redondo too. Cold as hell and murky/low visibility. Nothing like the Carribean bro.
Honestly the older I get the more I like to just snorkel. I've seen some of the best marine life water chest high and 50 meters out.
Very true, you don't need to go deep with tanks far offshore when the water is crystal-clear. Maui, Molokini, Bora Bora, Fiji, I had just as much fun snorkeling there as I ever would have on a dive in those spots. Besides it is cold and murky in Puget Sound. Fuck wetsuits lol. Give me warm water, colorful fish and manta rays.
I think this sub crew is long gone. Hope I'm wrong.
Honestly the older I get the more I like to just snorkel. I've seen some of the best marine life water chest high and 50 meters out.
Very true, you don't need to go deep with tanks far offshore when the water is crystal-clear. Maui, Molokini, Bora Bora, Fiji, I had just as much fun snorkeling there as I ever would have on a dive in those spots. Besides it is cold and murky in Puget Sound. Fuck wetsuits lol. Give me warm water, colorful fish and manta rays.
I think this sub crew is long gone. Hope I'm wrong.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12901
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
Is Bora Bora not one of the most beautiful places on earth?!?!maoling wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:20 pmAs a kid I dove off of Redondo too. Cold as hell and murky/low visibility. Nothing like the Carribean bro.
Honestly the older I get the more I like to just snorkel. I've seen some of the best marine life water chest high and 50 meters out.
Very true, you don't need to go deep with tanks far offshore when the water is crystal-clear. Maui, Molokini, Bora Bora, Fiji, I had just as much fun snorkeling there as I ever would have on a dive in those spots. Besides it is cold and murky in Puget Sound. Fuck wetsuits lol. Give me warm water, colorful fish and manta rays.
I think this sub crew is long gone. Hope I'm wrong.
That is on my bucket for a return trip.
We swam with tiger and lemon sharks there.
Ate Mai Mai everyday.
Unbelievable.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
I got certified and dove in Belize and on a Caribbean cruise but then asked myself why in the hell to I want to fear for my life on a vacation. Snorkeling is plenty good for me. Can see almost everything you can scuba diving.seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:23 amThat's a lot of pressure they are under. Prayers they get back O.K.maoling wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 12:56 amI'll be amazed if anyone survives whatever has happened to it. Hope they get lucky, but I think somehow it got entangled down there, or some sea critter hit it and compromised the hull.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/other/ ... r-AA1cLKZw
The article says 8 hours on average to decompress and get back to the surface. Crazy.
I've been down 160 feet scuba diving and realizing I don't need or want to go any deeper than that ever in the ocean.
I got scared because we were always taught to stay within the 130 feet depth range but the water was so clear and deceptive.
Granted I was with a Marine Biologist who's crew knew exactly what they were doing so it was my best dive ever.
They most likely if surviving will spend days in a decompression tank with hopefully no long term lung/brain damage.
dt
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
I got certified when I was in the Marine Corps on Okinawa, and it was fine. It was sort of cool to be way down there. But I didn't love it the way I thought I would and I just got to thinking about all that water that's on top of you when you're a hundred feet down and so that was that for me and scuba diving.D-train wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 6:14 pmI got certified and dove in Belize and on a Caribbean cruise but then asked myself why in the hell to I want to fear for my life on a vacation. Snorkeling is plenty good for me. Can see almost everything you can scuba diving.seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:23 amThat's a lot of pressure they are under. Prayers they get back O.K.maoling wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 12:56 amI'll be amazed if anyone survives whatever has happened to it. Hope they get lucky, but I think somehow it got entangled down there, or some sea critter hit it and compromised the hull.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/other/ ... r-AA1cLKZw
The article says 8 hours on average to decompress and get back to the surface. Crazy.
I've been down 160 feet scuba diving and realizing I don't need or want to go any deeper than that ever in the ocean.
I got scared because we were always taught to stay within the 130 feet depth range but the water was so clear and deceptive.
Granted I was with a Marine Biologist who's crew knew exactly what they were doing so it was my best dive ever.
They most likely if surviving will spend days in a decompression tank with hopefully no long term lung/brain damage.
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
I think instead of ST trip next year I will organize a trip to the bottom of Mariana's Trench. Only 36k feet deep. Any one interested???
dt
Re: Missing Titanic Submersible
I'll stick with snorkeling, thank you very much!