The New Election Interference Strategy
-
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:37 pm
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
The first clue of the pretense of the New Yorker article is the extent to which the author parades the credentials of the so-called conservatives.
The American Constitutional Society, founded by liberals and counselled by among others Lawrence Tribe is politically left of Hillary Clinton. Tribe is a swamp specimen.
Section 3 disqualification clause has never been defined by Congress. Congress has never legislated a process of determination. Because there is no statute or case law the High Court has nothing to rule on. It will take Congress to set the parameters but only for future matters. Crafting law to essentially keep Trump off the ballot would be "ex post facto". Meaning "retroactive"....which would violate Article 1 Sec 10 clause 1.
On top of all of this the DOJ has not charged the former President with said "disqualification" crimes. None of the indictments of the 4 cases even touch upon "insurrection, rebellion or giving aid and comfort to the enemy" BTW, under the constitution "an enemy" must be defined (by Congress) a designation by law. The last time they defined an "enemy" was Germany/ Japan in the 40's. Not ironically, the last time we won a war.
And finally "putting down insurrection, enforcing the laws of the United States, and repel Invasions" are powers to be defined by Congress and enforced by the President. How ironic.
...So a sitting President violated an undefined clause of Amendment 14, and said clause is now invoked (assumably defined) to prevent his lawful pursuit of election ???
We are such a nation of lies.
The American Constitutional Society, founded by liberals and counselled by among others Lawrence Tribe is politically left of Hillary Clinton. Tribe is a swamp specimen.
Section 3 disqualification clause has never been defined by Congress. Congress has never legislated a process of determination. Because there is no statute or case law the High Court has nothing to rule on. It will take Congress to set the parameters but only for future matters. Crafting law to essentially keep Trump off the ballot would be "ex post facto". Meaning "retroactive"....which would violate Article 1 Sec 10 clause 1.
On top of all of this the DOJ has not charged the former President with said "disqualification" crimes. None of the indictments of the 4 cases even touch upon "insurrection, rebellion or giving aid and comfort to the enemy" BTW, under the constitution "an enemy" must be defined (by Congress) a designation by law. The last time they defined an "enemy" was Germany/ Japan in the 40's. Not ironically, the last time we won a war.
And finally "putting down insurrection, enforcing the laws of the United States, and repel Invasions" are powers to be defined by Congress and enforced by the President. How ironic.
...So a sitting President violated an undefined clause of Amendment 14, and said clause is now invoked (assumably defined) to prevent his lawful pursuit of election ???
We are such a nation of lies.
-
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:37 pm
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
Lower taxes, less government. Because in the end, that's what works. And it's just not a theory. You can look throughout history, and when we had less government, you have a better economy, you have better lives, better everything.
All government does is slow everything down. Government caused the Great Depression.
All government does is slow everything down. Government caused the Great Depression.
- Cascade Kid
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:11 am
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
The Dem politicians are doing it again, and this time they are attempting to interfere in Washington.
https://komonews.com/news/local/kitsap- ... -colorado#
-So, how did Ithaka get the idea to file this petition? She told KOMO News she has a two-hour commute, and while listening to the radio one day, she heard an interview with Secretary of State Steve Hobbs.
“He basically outlined this right that citizens in the state of Washington have to bring this forward,” said Ithaka.
She and seven others filed their petition in Kitsap County, where they are all registered to vote, and they also filed it in Thurston County since that’s where the Secretary of State’s office is located.
https://komonews.com/news/local/kitsap- ... -colorado#
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 15104
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
Geez they are going to steal the election for the democrats...oh wait
-
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:34 am
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
Isn't there a place on the ballot
where you can write in a candidate?
Maybe not for President?
"They" are trying to take away
our right to vote for a candidate
of your choice!
where you can write in a candidate?
Maybe not for President?
"They" are trying to take away
our right to vote for a candidate
of your choice!
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 15104
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
The issue is going to be decided by the supreme court. If the court was to agree with the petitioners, which I think is very doubtful it wouldn't be interference, it would be the law
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 15104
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: The New Election Interference Strategy
I just saw the supreme court is going to take up Donald's eligibility for the presidency in February. That's fast work.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 15104
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am