should've taken Jalen Carter

[Donn Beach]

Sure, take all the other teams best game out too

[D-train]

5th in sack %

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/sack-pct

Mainly because of one game against a broken offense. Take that out and they have been below average.

We are so lucky to be the only team to play the giants

[SeattleAddict]

5th in sack %

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/sack-pct

Mainly because of one game against a broken offense. Take that out and they have been below average.

We are so lucky to be the only team to play the giants

this would be amazing to play the Giants every week. Not only would we be 6-0, we'd lead the league in EVERYTHING.

[D-train]

I don't know they now have the great tyrod Taylor at quarterback.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Sure, take all the other teams best game out too

There are outliers and then there are massive outliers. If you take every teams' best sack total game out the Seahawks would still drop in the rankings. Their avg sacks per game would go from 3.8 to 2.4.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

5th in sack %

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/sack-pct

Mainly because of one game against a broken offense. Take that out and they have been below average.

We are so lucky to be the only team to play the giants

Lucky to play them when their O line was complete shit.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Seahawks are 19th in Hurries.

https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/team-stat ... Order=desc

16th in Pressure%

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... 23/opp.htm

[Donn Beach]

Sure, take all the other teams best game out too

There are outliers and then there are massive outliers. If you take every teams' best sack total game out the Seahawks would still drop in the rankings. Their avg sacks per game would go from 3.8 to 2.4.

I didn't say they wouldn't drop but you can't just take only the Hawks best game out and then
compare. I'm taking basic scientific approach

[D-train]

Sure, take all the other teams best game out too

There are outliers and then there are massive outliers. If you take every teams' best sack total game out the Seahawks would still drop in the rankings. Their avg sacks per game would go from 3.8 to 2.4.

I didn't say they wouldn't drop but you can't just take only the Hawks best game out and then
compare. I'm taking basic scientific approach

Yeah would be quite the calculation to exclude the game that every team had the most sacks but only if it was vs. the Giants or another team with a shit O line with more than 2.5 injuries. lol

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Even with that game the Seahawks have been statistically a mediocre pass rushing team.