Garver getting death threats

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Sat Aug 03, 2024 11:11 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:08 am
Some of the places I have lived, yeah. This like an analogy thing? Hey, I don't have anything against walls. They have a purpose, mostly psychological. I don't agree with them being offered as a solution to immigration issues.

Hey, on another note, did you see this? ... that's funny

Max Buck, isn't that a cartoon character? Who repeatedly accused Trump of being a foreign asset, wife as now been indicted for.... yes you guessed it, being a foreign asset!

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/ ... n-00172298
What does that tell you?
Can you make the connection?

Whenever the left accuses President Trump of anything, they (the left) is actually doing it. It's like getting caught with your hand in the cookie jar and pointing at your little brother...."he did it".

Please wise up.

Pharmabro
Posts: 5856
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 8:32 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by Pharmabro » Sun Aug 04, 2024 12:17 am

Donn Beach wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2024 1:14 pm
Because it's not a solution, again walls have a purpose but believing building a wall will solve the illegal immigration issues is simplistic and wrong. Trump contends it was built and it hasn't solved anything. There were already walls along the border. Most of the distance of the new wall already had previous ones. Folks love a simple answer but it's really not solving anything. You realize nearly half of illegal immigrants consist of visa overstays. What does a wall do to solve that?
The wall is symbolic, it is part of the bit about being a "sovereign nation" and knowing who is with-in our borders and why, and for how long. Are they mentally ill, a career criminal, do they have courageous diseases? When I was deployed to the Gulf region when we landed in Kuwait we were all screened for disease. These "open borders" nut cases that insist that every person crossing the border is a wonderful addition to the tapestry of the American quilt are woefully foolish. Legal immigrants are generally accepted from high SES people: high degrees of education, morals, merit, and the like. Illegal immigrants are generally from low (Social Economic Status) = high degrees of poor health mental, physical, high degrees of criminality, higher percentage of illiterate and low IQ types.

The wall should be part of a system. When I rent/ buy a house, car, cough syrup, a lighter, a beer, a cell phone I prove who I am and am allowed to purchase the item. People in the US identify themselves all the time. Those that don't belong should be returned to their country of origin along with a bill for the resources it cost the US taxpayer to house them and fly them back.

This shit headed attempt by the Dims to claim they are on a higher moral plane and are being sympathetic to poor and beautiful immigrants while pandering to that identity group and counting on incoming majority democrat votes? My god, the power hungry dims. Who cares if the country is becoming poorer by the day as long as I am in power! It is a better outcome. Democrats are evil, immoral, dishonest, condescending, war-mongering, fascists, without a single redeeming quality.

User avatar
Coeurd’Alene J
Posts: 5567
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:56 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by Coeurd’Alene J » Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:19 am

In response to this thread. Someone murdered Mitch’s batting average

User avatar
TLO Idaho
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:33 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by TLO Idaho » Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:41 am

Coeurd’Alene J wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:19 am
In response to this thread. Someone murdered Mitch’s batting average
You did mean both Mitchs right?

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14257
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by bpj » Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:58 am

Coeurd’Alene J wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:19 am
In response to this thread. Someone murdered Mitch’s batting average
:lol:

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14257
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by bpj » Tue Aug 06, 2024 1:00 am

TLO Idaho wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:41 am
Coeurd’Alene J wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:19 am
In response to this thread. Someone murdered Mitch’s batting average
You did mean both Mitchs right?
Haniger has an .802 OPS since 7/1 so hopefully he's coming around. I'd love to see Mitch here when the team finally wins.

User avatar
TLO Idaho
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:33 am

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by TLO Idaho » Tue Aug 06, 2024 1:52 pm

bpj wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 1:00 am
TLO Idaho wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:41 am
Coeurd’Alene J wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2024 12:19 am
In response to this thread. Someone murdered Mitch’s batting average
You did mean both Mitchs right?
Haniger has an .802 OPS since 7/1 so hopefully he's coming around. I'd love to see Mitch here when the team finally wins.
So would I. HE does deserve it.

User avatar
mostonmike
Posts: 2231
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:35 pm
Location: Manchester, England

Re: Garver getting death threats

Post by mostonmike » Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:49 pm

mostonmike wrote:
Sat Aug 03, 2024 5:05 pm
What if the “death threats” result in a massive turnaround in Garver’s performances? What if he suddenly sparks into life and reaches the Mendoza line? That would mean that death threats could be perceived in some quarters to be good thing that should not be underestimated as a tactic. We would obviously re-iterate the general disapproval of these methods, but the pro-death threat contingent will have significant data showing that death threats do work. We need him to remain shite or even go worse, to avoid proving death threats are a good thing.
Thankfully he is now 1 for 7 since the death threats so hopefully we can now close this thread with proof that death threats won't turn around someone's performance and may even make them play worse.

We can now thank Mitch for participating in this social experiment.

Post Reply