Still waiting for the list of good moves that shows a 1/3 success rate......Pharmabro wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:30 pmHe does not "screw up 95% of the time". That is your emotional and non objective statement. I have identified the ballpark as the main and most important factor. Ump bias plays a part as well.Captain 97 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 6:03 amThats all you got for a comeback?Pharmabro wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:03 pm
Yes your hindsight is off the charts. Most of us applauded the 140 OPS+ bat Winker brought and Saurez was a bounce back salary dump.
Polanco, and Ray. I remember a majority of us (vastly so) counted them as good moves.
I can't stand people who look at moves at the time and go "We signed the reigning CY"! Fk, yes! And then a ho-hum 1st year followed by a injury and "The Great Leader~Cap" comes on-line and makes his little gay list and proclaims he is better and smarter and all the trades he would have made would have worked out! I would have signed only guys that would have thrived. "I Cap would have graped Billy B into trading his top 10 hitter to his division rival"! You bet ya. "I am Captain I know who fails and thrives and develops ahead of time I have a set of crystal balls between my legs that I rub and they give me insights into all future events" "I am the Alpha and the Omega, I am Cap, hear me roar."
Cut the Cap!
Name Calling? LOL
Lets see the list of moves that worked out.
Hind sight is the only way that any GM is ever evaluated. You don't get to to screw up 95% of the time and keep your job because it had the potential to work.
So yes, Cut the Cap!
Its not coming because it doesn't exist. 95% failure rate on trades and FA acquisitions go ahead and prove me wrong.