Another assassination attempt

[douche]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... dates.html

[bpj]

His X account has an email that when you web search it leads to a pro-Ukraine website that he apparently runs. See the matching emails-

[bpj]

The website-

https://fightforukraine.com.ua/

[Seattle or Bust]

Seems a disenfranchised former Trump supporter with mentally ill tendencies that backed Haley, Tulsi and Vivek against Trump and supported Ukraine in the war effort.

You'd love him BPJ... he def wasn't a fan of Jewish people and was very anti-vax.

Perhaps keeping AK-47's out of the hands of insane people like this is a good idea?

[bpj]

Lol.

He's just a Trump-hating loon like you.

Trump didn't support his pet project Ukraine, so the guy tried to go kill him.

Whackjob Ukraine supporter.

Just a mirror-image of the whackjob Israel supporters. Retards on both sides.

[gil]

So ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.

But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

So ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.

But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)

I don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.

Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.

I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.

[gil]

So ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.

But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)

I don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.

Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.

I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.

BGG? Nice ring to it!

I don't think that's accurate, but how do I convince you otherwise? I believe in rights to speech, weapons (within limits), and reproductive choice. I think the government should get involved to make things "orderly": things like public safety, protecting consumers and employees, and letting markets work (i.e, thwarting monopoly power).

And yes, government should get involved in throwing any possible change against some asshole who plans to assassinate Trump! Let's see if the existing laws take care of him. If they don't, I'm open to considering new laws. But right now, I don't know what you can do about someone who *might have* shot at Trump if his gun was owned legally and he acted alone.

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

So ... this piece of shit has been charged for gun violations, I am reading. He was a convicted felon and shouldn't have had a gun (so much for absolute 2nd amendment rights, correct?) And he had scratched off the serial number.

But honest question: If he hadn't done either of these, what would he be charged with? It seems that you HAVE to have SOME law against stalking another person with a high powered rifle, even if you didn't fire. (especially someone who has a 50% chance of becoming the next President)

I don't even know what you mean by that. But we all know you are against anything to do with rights for the public.....Big Government Gil.

Felons do not have a 2nd Amendment Right, and almost everyone is fine with that.

I say charge this fucker to the full extent of the law......WITH THE EXISTING LAWS.

BGG? Nice ring to it!

I don't think that's accurate, but how do I convince you otherwise? I believe in rights to speech, weapons (within limits), and reproductive choice. I think the government should get involved to make things "orderly": things like public safety, protecting consumers and employees, and letting markets work (i.e, thwarting monopoly power).

And yes, government should get involved in throwing any possible change against some asshole who plans to assassinate Trump! Let's see if the existing laws take care of him. If they don't, I'm open to considering new laws. But right now, I don't know what you can do about someone who *might have* shot at Trump if his gun was owned legally and he acted alone.

Yes, you claim all these things, but when it get's down to it, you are no better than SoB with your political views.....:
Government
Government
Government

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

An I think it's kind of funny that you say you want government to be involved with so many things, but not abortion.