What kind of move would that beHawkandMariner88 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:52 amDonn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:21 amIt's probably how they could afford to go after Naylor, even teams that aren't so poverty driven need to find ways to save money. You could spend more and end up with less WAR. Or use him someplace else. Replacing Moore could make sense but then you have both corner infielders to replace. Honestly, williamson and naylor at the corners, your outfield is already deep enough. Really just leaves 2nd base. Bring Polanco back and play him there part time, rivas? And this is before an actual blockbuster type move from Dipoto. Maybe you dip into your pitching and add another bat. There are possibilities for fielding a pretty decent team.
2025 Prospects Thread
-
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 10:33 pm
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 17840
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
Blockbuster is the wrong term but the fact is they have a lot of trade capital available. You can make an argument for a pretty much status quo lineup next season, or on the other hand dipoto could actually upgrade a position. The outfield is probably the easiest but the least needed. I am going to say first base is surprisingly thin isn't it. Thats for the hot stove, where could they upgrade with a prospect tradeHawkandMariner88 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:52 amWhat kind of move would that beHawkandMariner88 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:52 amDonn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:21 am
It's probably how they could afford to go after Naylor, even teams that aren't so poverty driven need to find ways to save money. You could spend more and end up with less WAR. Or use him someplace else. Replacing Moore could make sense but then you have both corner infielders to replace. Honestly, williamson and naylor at the corners, your outfield is already deep enough. Really just leaves 2nd base. Bring Polanco back and play him there part time, rivas? And this is before an actual blockbuster type move from Dipoto. Maybe you dip into your pitching and add another bat. There are possibilities for fielding a pretty decent team.
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
Garver 12mil off books, Poland declines 6 mil option and that covers Naylors cost. Maybe they trade Arozarena and save another 15 milDonn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:53 amBlockbuster is the wrong term but the fact is they have a lot of trade capital available. You can make an argument for a pretty much status quo lineup next season, or on the other hand dipoto could actually upgrade a position. The outfield is probably the easiest but the least needed. I am going to say first base is surprisingly thin isn't it. Thats for the hot stove, where could they upgrade with a prospect trade
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
Polanco has to agree to take less money to come back here. Are you calling Young who was a top 3 prospect from our amazing farm system a bust?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:21 amIt's probably how they could afford to go after Naylor, even teams that aren't so poverty driven need to find ways to save money. You could spend more and end up with less WAR. Or use him someplace else. Replacing Moore could make sense but then you have both corner infielders to replace. Honestly, williamson and naylor at the corners, your outfield is already deep enough. Really just leaves 2nd base. Bring Polanco back and play him there part time, rivas? And this is before an actual blockbuster type move from Dipoto. Maybe you dip into your pitching and add another bat. There are possibilities for fielding a pretty decent team.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 1:39 amIt is actually a decent idea for a poverty franchise but they pretend we are a poverty franchise so I guess your point still applies.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 11:34 pm
Yeah, I know, I am putting his noodle bat there for his league average war which i believe would be pretty much iron clad, saving the $30 mil spent hoping Gino doesn't crater and use it elsewhere
dt
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
Would be crazy to trade Randy. Send me a text Dave. Thinking about bring over a Papa Murphy's Pizza and watching a Royals or Astros game with you guys next week?desbcoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:59 pmGarver 12mil off books, Poland declines 6 mil option and that covers Naylors cost. Maybe they trade Arozarena and save another 15 milDonn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:53 amBlockbuster is the wrong term but the fact is they have a lot of trade capital available. You can make an argument for a pretty much status quo lineup next season, or on the other hand dipoto could actually upgrade a position. The outfield is probably the easiest but the least needed. I am going to say first base is surprisingly thin isn't it. Thats for the hot stove, where could they upgrade with a prospect trade
dt
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 17840
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
They can agree on whatever contract they want, they signed him this last after declining the option. Probably not but he does seem to like it thereD-train wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 7:04 pmPolanco has to agree to take less money to come back here. Are you calling Young who was a top 3 prospect from our amazing farm system a bust?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:21 amIt's probably how they could afford to go after Naylor, even teams that aren't so poverty driven need to find ways to save money. You could spend more and end up with less WAR. Or use him someplace else. Replacing Moore could make sense but then you have both corner infielders to replace. Honestly, williamson and naylor at the corners, your outfield is already deep enough. Really just leaves 2nd base. Bring Polanco back and play him there part time, rivas? And this is before an actual blockbuster type move from Dipoto. Maybe you dip into your pitching and add another bat. There are possibilities for fielding a pretty decent team.
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
That definitely increases the chances and he might take a slight discount but probably follows the money if it is better elsewhere.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 9:48 pmThey can agree on whatever contract they want, they signed him this last after declining the option. Probably not but he does seem to like it thereD-train wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 7:04 pmPolanco has to agree to take less money to come back here. Are you calling Young who was a top 3 prospect from our amazing farm system a bust?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 6:21 am
It's probably how they could afford to go after Naylor, even teams that aren't so poverty driven need to find ways to save money. You could spend more and end up with less WAR. Or use him someplace else. Replacing Moore could make sense but then you have both corner infielders to replace. Honestly, williamson and naylor at the corners, your outfield is already deep enough. Really just leaves 2nd base. Bring Polanco back and play him there part time, rivas? And this is before an actual blockbuster type move from Dipoto. Maybe you dip into your pitching and add another bat. There are possibilities for fielding a pretty decent team.
dt
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 17840
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2025 Prospects Thread
You know he was being persued by the Astros last season when he signed with the mariners. That seems like a pretty significant decision now terms of how things have gone