Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 79546
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by D-train » Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:16 pm

AV

Shaheed 8 + Wilson 5 + Jobe 5 = 18

Riq 3 + Walker 9 = 12
dt

Donn Beach
Posts: 19272
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:18 pm

D-train wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:08 pm
So Walker + Woolen = $27M

Jobe + Shaheed + Williams = $27M
With Rasheed being the interesting one. I feel rather proud of myself calling that one but it turned on Rasheed relenting in his demands which he didnt, everything points to JS being the one that relented. It really kinda blows my whole JS theory out of the water.

Captain 97
Posts: 3736
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Captain 97 » Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:25 pm

Relenting to what demands?

Donn Beach
Posts: 19272
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Mar 13, 2026 5:12 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:25 pm
Relenting to what demands?
Contact demands.. It had seemed to me JS would set a number and pretty much stick to it terms of contract negotiations. It was about his cap strategy and player analysis rather than what another team might value a player. With shaheed it would seem like he bit the bullet, came up and met another teams offer. It had been reported him and rasheed being far apart on a number. That surprised the heck out of me.

So why was he willing to meet Rasheeds price and not Walkers? In my mind injury risk is a significant part of it

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 79546
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by D-train » Fri Mar 13, 2026 5:45 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 5:12 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:25 pm
Relenting to what demands?
Contact demands.. It had seemed to me JS would set a number and pretty much stick to it terms of contract negotiations. It was about his cap strategy and player analysis rather than what another team might value a player. With shaheed it would seem like he bit the bullet, came up and met another teams offer. It had been reported him and rasheed being far apart on a number. That surprised the heck out of me.

So why was he willing to meet Rasheeds price and not Walkers? In my mind injury risk is a significant part of it
I sure hope it wasn't because we don't have 4th or 5th round picks because of him. Sunk cost. Could have nabbed a RB with one of those.
dt

Captain 97
Posts: 3736
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Mar 17, 2026 8:09 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 5:12 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 4:25 pm
Relenting to what demands?
Contact demands.. It had seemed to me JS would set a number and pretty much stick to it terms of contract negotiations. It was about his cap strategy and player analysis rather than what another team might value a player. With shaheed it would seem like he bit the bullet, came up and met another teams offer. It had been reported him and rasheed being far apart on a number. That surprised the heck out of me.

So why was he willing to meet Rasheeds price and not Walkers? In my mind injury risk is a significant part of it
So your just guessing? Seems just as likely that Shaheed realized nobody wanted to pay top dollar for a role player reciever who is good at returning kicks and decided he would accept Johns offer. His contract is not that big for receiver.

Donn Beach
Posts: 19272
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Mar 17, 2026 11:45 pm

Yeah, listening to what's been said since the deal got done that might not be accurate. JS saying it turned on Rasheed really wanting to stay. It's interesting how JS seemed to value Rasheed more than Walker

Michael K.
Posts: 14173
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Michael K. » Wed Mar 18, 2026 2:10 pm

D-train wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2026 5:45 pm

I sure hope it wasn't because we don't have 4th or 5th round picks because of him. Sunk cost. Could have nabbed a RB with one of those.
Wasn't it just a couple of days ago you said the picks we have won't turn into a starting caliber RB, but the picks lower would have? OK.

Michael K.
Posts: 14173
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by Michael K. » Wed Mar 18, 2026 2:11 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Mar 17, 2026 8:09 pm

So your just guessing? Seems just as likely that Shaheed realized nobody wanted to pay top dollar for a role player reciever who is good at returning kicks and decided he would accept Johns offer. His contract is not that big for receiver.
I've already covered this. Shaheed is like the 24th highest paid WR in football, Walker is now like the 4th highest paid back. Value is what they went with. I am flat out blown away by the amount of doubt that this group that has seemed to earn exactly the opposite is getting.

He doesn't franchise tag guys that don't want to be here. Let me know when that has burned us in the ass? I'll wait.

User avatar
douche
Posts: 2937
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:41 pm

Re: Woolen's Future (or lack thereof)

Post by douche » Wed Mar 18, 2026 6:11 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Mar 17, 2026 11:45 pm
Yeah, listening to what's been said since the deal got done that might not be accurate. JS saying it turned on Rasheed really wanting to stay. It's interesting how JS seemed to value Rasheed more than Walker
It's generally considered that running backs are the most easily replaced, although there are rare exceptions.

I think Shaheed's speed plays into it. If they can find a way to use his speed to exploit defenses, he could end up being very dangerous. There's a saying in traffic law enforcement... 'Speed kills'. And speed is one of those 'uncoachable' traits... a player either has it, or he doesn't. I would be willing to bet that Macdonald had significant input regarding this decision.

I think they'll work on the timing and the routes, and get Shaheed more involved as a Percy Harvin type of weapon.

Post Reply