Do you know what the one glaring difference is?Captain 97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2026 6:31 pmAt the time they cut france his numbers were absolutely comparable to Naylors numbers at the time they signed him.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2026 6:07 pmHe hasn't been the statistical equivalent to Naylor for years. You can't just spout that nonsense.Captain 97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2026 6:00 pmHe got sporadic playing time because of the particular needs of the teams he was on at the time. He was a filler piece in Cincinnati while they were transitioning to a younger lineup. Minnesota was just a giant mess and decided to blow things up and rebuild and obviously he wasn't going to start over Vlad in Toronto.
Yes they were fooled and his current stats bear that out.
Somehow you think a season and half of struggles is more indicative of who a player is than the other 7 seasons of success. Obviously this is a matter of opinion and I am not even concerned with the particular player. Even if France was sucking this year its a philosophical Issue. The problem is they pulled the plug on a player who even in his struggles was only slightly below league average as a hitter and they did so without an answer waiting in the wings. Then they decide to go out and commit long term to a player who statistically equivalent to the guy they pulled the plug on. It is a classic sell low buy high blunder and the roster construction is going to be screwed for several years because of it.
From '23-'25 Naylor was the FAR superior player.
The fact that you don't get that is astounding.
The M's cut France in 2024. In the 3 seasons prior (21-23) he put up 8.0 WAR
The M's signed Naylor in 2026 in the 3 seasons prior(23-25) he put up 6.8 WAR
France was trending well down and Naylor was trending well up. France had put up 0.7 bWAR in 230 games in '23 and '24 for the M's. Naylor had had put up 6.8 bWAR between '23-'25 before the M's signed him.
I really don't want to be disrespectful but like... are you trolling me and others here right now?