More on Clowney

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75808
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: More on Clowney

Post by D-train » Wed May 06, 2020 3:12 pm

ThePro wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 2:27 pm
So Hawks are what 2 mil ( if that) apart from Clowney's asking price? Four other teams are in the mix because of this shit. Brilliant. He obviously wants to be here.
Less than 2/3 the amount we spent on our 13th O lineman.

https://nfltraderumors.co/seahawks-sign ... 3-3m-deal/
dt

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by ThePro » Wed May 06, 2020 3:42 pm


User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16745
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Donn Beach » Wed May 06, 2020 4:25 pm

yeah, feel like that is pretty much what i have been saying. Funny that Stanton talks about fans wanting the Hawks to move on, where the guys on this forum seem to want the Hawks to give in and give him what he wants. He has the best contract he is going to see in front of him, anything from now on is going to be teams hunting for value. There is no reason for the Hawks to bid against themselves. Sign the damn contract Jadeveon, if you keep waiting, the Hawks could end up signing Griffen and then you are screwed

Michael K.
Posts: 12696
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Michael K. » Wed May 06, 2020 4:39 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
And again, for all the complaining, i think they could come out of this with a pretty fair team. I am not concerned about the offensive line, yeah they signed a bunch of guys, maybe that actually works.
You are not concerned about an O Line that has been a concern every year since they lost the Super Bowl? And you are basing that off them signing a bunch of guys because "MAYBE that actually works."? Why?
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
I think that offense could really take off, they did add weapons for RW, DK will be a year older.
They added what weapons? A TE that had the option of coming here or the television booth, a track star at WR that hasn't worked out anywhere else, two skinny TEs in the draft they want to fatten up so they can block and a RB from Miami that had like 150 carries his last year in college? Which one of these weapons has you so excited? DK having another year under his belt would have happened regardless of any other move. We are still a 2 WR team built around the run game in a pass first league. Unless some miracle with Penny happens, we will run this offense with one proven RB that wasn't retired last year...yet, we will play power football with 90% of the snaps out of the Gun with no FB. Genius.
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
And they have added pieces to the defense. If they add a DE or two the line looks alright,
So, we should base our excitement on something they MAY do? They MIGHT add to the pass rush? The only move they made that has us significantly better than last year is adding a CB, who has had some injury issues. I like the pass rushers they added in the draft, but most think that he will need some seasoning right? I hope not, but it is very easy to see they may not add a ton to our rush next year.

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
and that backfield should be pretty solid,
Based on? Judging by the trust we put in Homer as a rookie last year, and the perceived interest in Lynch, I would say next year we are REALLY screwed if Carson goes down. Cross your fingers that Penny is ready? Is that why you think the backfield will be solid? I like the kid we drafted, but knowing what I know about how they used Homer last year I don't have much faith that Dallas is going to get much run.

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
and I think Brooks could be a bigger help than you might think for the linebacking. i said before the issue really was the defense, but they don't need the second coming of the LOB, they just need to get better, and they could be. I guess the disappointment is the lack of a big off season splash, but it could be JS spread the dough around pretty effectively filling out the team. I know I am just a Hawk ass kisser but I am really not that discouraged about their prospects
My biggest issue IS that they attacked the problem by "spreading out the dough". There where two impact players available on both lines, and instead we signed 6 mediocre players. Brooks doesn't play an impact position, IMO, and will he really make us better than last year when Kendricks and KJ were playing the spots he is said to be competing with Barton for?

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by ThePro » Wed May 06, 2020 5:20 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 4:25 pm
Sign the damn contract Jadeveon, if you keep waiting, the Hawks could end up signing Griffen and then you are screwed
Why would he sign a contract that he feels is less than he should get? He isn't the GM and Coach of a team that every team in the division had made improvements.

If they choose to go the Griffen route only one of them is screwed. Clowney will play somewhere. Hawks will regress. They need him . End of story.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16745
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Donn Beach » Wed May 06, 2020 5:21 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 4:39 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
And again, for all the complaining, i think they could come out of this with a pretty fair team. I am not concerned about the offensive line, yeah they signed a bunch of guys, maybe that actually works.
You are not concerned about an O Line that has been a concern every year since they lost the Super Bowl? And you are basing that off them signing a bunch of guys because "MAYBE that actually works."? Why?
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
I think that offense could really take off, they did add weapons for RW, DK will be a year older.
They added what weapons? A TE that had the option of coming here or the television booth, a track star at WR that hasn't worked out anywhere else, two skinny TEs in the draft they want to fatten up so they can block and a RB from Miami that had like 150 carries his last year in college? Which one of these weapons has you so excited? DK having another year under his belt would have happened regardless of any other move. We are still a 2 WR team built around the run game in a pass first league. Unless some miracle with Penny happens, we will run this offense with one proven RB that wasn't retired last year...yet, we will play power football with 90% of the snaps out of the Gun with no FB. Genius.
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
And they have added pieces to the defense. If they add a DE or two the line looks alright,
So, we should base our excitement on something they MAY do? They MIGHT add to the pass rush? The only move they made that has us significantly better than last year is adding a CB, who has had some injury issues. I like the pass rushers they added in the draft, but most think that he will need some seasoning right? I hope not, but it is very easy to see they may not add a ton to our rush next year.

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
and that backfield should be pretty solid,
Based on? Judging by the trust we put in Homer as a rookie last year, and the perceived interest in Lynch, I would say next year we are REALLY screwed if Carson goes down. Cross your fingers that Penny is ready? Is that why you think the backfield will be solid? I like the kid we drafted, but knowing what I know about how they used Homer last year I don't have much faith that Dallas is going to get much run.

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 1:58 pm
and I think Brooks could be a bigger help than you might think for the linebacking. i said before the issue really was the defense, but they don't need the second coming of the LOB, they just need to get better, and they could be. I guess the disappointment is the lack of a big off season splash, but it could be JS spread the dough around pretty effectively filling out the team. I know I am just a Hawk ass kisser but I am really not that discouraged about their prospects
My biggest issue IS that they attacked the problem by "spreading out the dough". There where two impact players available on both lines, and instead we signed 6 mediocre players. Brooks doesn't play an impact position, IMO, and will he really make us better than last year when Kendricks and KJ were playing the spots he is said to be competing with Barton for?
I was speaking to the defensive backfield, i think the offensive backfield could still be a concern...Where did i say anything about where to base your excitement? You don't have to be excited if you don't feel like it, that is up to you.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16745
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Donn Beach » Wed May 06, 2020 5:22 pm

ThePro wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 5:20 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 4:25 pm
Sign the damn contract Jadeveon, if you keep waiting, the Hawks could end up signing Griffen and then you are screwed
Why would he sign a contract that he feels is less than he should get? He isn't the GM and Coach of a team that every team in the division had made improvements.

If they choose to go the Griffen route only one of them is screwed. Clowney will play somewhere. Hawks will regress. They need him . End of story.
because he is going to have to sign a contract for less than he feels he is worth for somebody, might as well be with the team he wants to play for

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by ThePro » Wed May 06, 2020 5:42 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 5:22 pm


because he is going to have to sign a contract for less than he feels he is worth for somebody, might as well be with the team he wants to play for
So the Hawks should sign inferior players then? Knowing it is an area of weakness that will stop them from advancing maybe even miss the playoffs.

Boy they sure will show him. :roll:

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16745
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Donn Beach » Wed May 06, 2020 6:00 pm

I wasn't speaking to what the Hawks should do, i was speaking to what I think Clowney should do, but sure if he doesn't want to sign it that is up to him.

Michael K.
Posts: 12696
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: More on Clowney

Post by Michael K. » Wed May 06, 2020 6:05 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 5:21 pm

I was speaking to the defensive backfield, i think the offensive backfield could still be a concern...Where did i say anything about where to base your excitement? You don't have to be excited if you don't feel like it, that is up to you.
I was asking YOU. Asking you to do something besides say the moves are good just because they made moves. For once, I am asking you to explain yourself, what you think...instead of telling me what the Organization thinks. I know what the organization thinks...the same thing it always thinks. The same thing that took us from two yards to a Super Bowl ring to enormous halftime deficits in every round two game we manage to make it to...after winning the WC round. IF we win the WC round.

Post Reply