Only people on this planet that are neutral are those in coma's. The issue I have is the supposed MAINSTREAM media are now without exception a propaganda machine for liberals. Just watch the supposed neutral Sunday morning shows and note the difference how dems and repubs are interviewed. And they claim they are neutral and unbiased. lol It's unreal. Here is a classic.gil wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:41 pmThese are pretty accurate statements as far as I can tell. The Koch brothers, the Devos family, Donald L. Luskin, and others have long had "agendas". Agree with them or not, I don't think they are neutral about their actions. They selectively use facts to support their pre-determined agendas. (Luskin is notorious for this, and is not a good forecaster based on his record.) The Koch brothers or the Devos family can spend their money they way they please (within the law, of course) but I think it's dangerous to have someone like Devos leading education policy. By the way, I'm all in favor of school choice; please just don't ask me to pay for your kid to go to a private for profit Christian school.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:24 pmI didn't call the Koch Brothers right wing conspiracy theorists... they pay right wing conspiracy theorists to promote an agenda that makes them a lot of money. Are they incapable of good deeds? No. But lets not pretend that the vast majority of their fortune hasn't gone to promote right-wing agendas that enables mass income inequality.
To your point about the Devos family and "school choice." The only school choice they want to see is one where private investors make millions off of your child's education and they want to control curriculum that puts Christianity first. The Devos family has donated over $200 million to right-wing think tanks since the 1970's... That family has been working to soften the separation between church and state for forever... she's not just "promoting school choice..."
6%?
Re: 6%?
dt
Re: 6%?
Gil, you've got time to jump ahead and ask me to do your homework for you, yet you claim that you don't have any time to back up claims you made just a day ago...?gil wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 8:46 pmMoe, I'd be INCREDIBLY angry if this were happening but I don't see a shred of evidence that it is anywhere near the 94% or whatever people are implying it is. Do you have a source OTHER THAN those that clearly have a right wing bias? You know, there are a lot of people who would like to see Trump defeated but want it to happen fairly.Moe Gibbs wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:26 pm1000s of people have tested positive and those results are kept on record by the State's DOHs. In 81% of these cases, those people who tested positive were symptom free and in most cases their close friends and relatives ALL tested negative. This fact alone creates a virulent breeding ground for DEATH COUNT FRAUD. Significant numbers of these people who at a later date died from a totally seperate cause were automatically counted as COVID19 deaths.
If there wasn't such a transparent agenda to sabotage all the gains that were made by the Trump Admin via all the turmoil that hyping the death count and shutting down our society accomplishes, the Wolves in our society wouldn't smell anything rotten going on. The most flagrant cases of Death Count Fraud are ALL at the hands of Liberals.
Give me a break.
Re: 6%?
Everyones in on it BUT YOU!!IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:13 pmIT'S AN OPINION PIECE WRITTEN BY A FORMER EDITOR AND COLUMNIST FOR THE NATIONAL REVIEW. Go to their website right now... every article posted is just nonsense trying to defame democrats.
That is literally what Donald L. Luskin has spent his career as a columnist doing.
Not to mention that he's currently the CIO of "Trend Macrolytics"... and their website is also used as a platform to do the exact same thing!!! He literally just reposts any Fox Business or personally written article that will paint Joe Biden in a negative light and scare investors into voting for Trump. They call it "Insights for action, for global investors." ... more like "I make a lot of money promoting right wing propaganda and business has never been better."
And yes... the WSJ is owned by The Dow Jones Company... you don't think these uber rich investors are doing everything in their power to keep the stock market at all time highs? They could care less about the average American so long as their pockets stay fat. And every opinion piece they have currently on their website is a hit job against Joe Biden because they know Trump will do everything in his power to keep them rich.
Don't mistake opinion for journalism. I'm asking you to consider the source before you post stuff like this... do some digging... see if this person has a reason to be biased.
We're all old white supremacists, including the stock market!
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: 6%?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 6% basically means this:
185,000 = Deaths
6,090,000 = Confirmed Cases
185,000 X .06 = 11,100 People that died for COVID-19 WITHOUT pre-existing conditions
11,100 / 6,090,000 = 0.18% Chance of dying from COVID-19 if you DID NOT have pre-existing conditions
Add to the fact that the CDC thinks 10 times as many people already had the virus but are not counted as confirmed cases, it means roughly 60M Americans already had it. So:
185,000 / 60,090,000 = 0.018%
Essentially, a person with no pre-existing health condition has only a 0.018% chance from dying if they contracted the coronavirus. IT'S TIME TO FULLY OPEN UP THE FUCKIN COUNTRY!
185,000 = Deaths
6,090,000 = Confirmed Cases
185,000 X .06 = 11,100 People that died for COVID-19 WITHOUT pre-existing conditions
11,100 / 6,090,000 = 0.18% Chance of dying from COVID-19 if you DID NOT have pre-existing conditions
Add to the fact that the CDC thinks 10 times as many people already had the virus but are not counted as confirmed cases, it means roughly 60M Americans already had it. So:
185,000 / 60,090,000 = 0.018%
Essentially, a person with no pre-existing health condition has only a 0.018% chance from dying if they contracted the coronavirus. IT'S TIME TO FULLY OPEN UP THE FUCKIN COUNTRY!
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: 6%?
When I announced the contest I had my broker put it in a special escrow account and now its $67!
dt
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: 6%?
Haha busted, she needs to get some botox injections instead of getting her hair dried. Democrats can't even figure out what they need, let alone what this country needs.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:04 amNo words........
https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/ ... 1768814592
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: 6%?
Damn, at this rate that Ulysses S. Grant will turn into a Ben Franklin by maybe even the end of the year.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:06 amWhen I announced the contest I had my broker put it in a special escrow account and now its $67!