Who will win the presidential election

[bpj]

Exactly. You never see anything as it happens. You're completely backwards facing. Makes talking to people like you before the end of an event pointless. You have no critical thinking ability like all the other CNN drones.

"Bother to reveal", as if doing so out of court is the best route? So braindead.

We'll see by January 20th.

[Donn Beach]

no, waiting for a court hearing would not be the best path, turning the evidence over to authorities as soon as possible would be. He claims he has evidence that involves national security? If its a national security issue then let the government investigate it, we are talking federal crimes here aren't we? No reason at all to be sitting on it. Giuliani is known for making wild claims like this that he doesn't back up, I am confident this is just another example of it. There is no evidence, and my understanding of that is not a lack of critical thinking, its in fact the opposite.

I don't watch CNN, I get my news from FOX, there is no evidence and there isn't going to be
https://twitter.com/i/status/1328026092976943104

[HawkBowler 2.0]

I don't watch CNN, I get my news from FOX, there is no evidence and there isn't going to be
https://twitter.com/i/status/1328026092976943104

Ha, your path to the dark side is nearly complete. The media has convinced you to believe there's no evidence and there's never going to be any. How can you put your faith into literally nothing?

DOJ investigations are secret, but you expect all the news to come out right away. How does that make sense? It's funny that you mention Fox because you have the same attitude as Leland Vitter:

https://twitter.com/alexbruesewitz/stat ... l-video%2F

[seattlefan-daBronx]

Really makes you stop and think doesn't it?
If our elections are controlled by computer and algorithms....
How many elections were or have been actually rigged?
Hell, maybe Trump knew about it and took advantage of the system over Hillary!
Maybe this is why Hillary keeps b*tching about the election being stolen from her.
She keeps saying "various factors" came into play...but she doesn't elaborate.
What's the "BIG SECRET" only the insiders know about?
Trump beat her to the punch. Did Russian hackers tap into the system?
That's all we heard about for 3 years...Russia, Russia, Russia.
Or maybe the opposite occurred...Russia tried to flip votes to Hillary's favor but failed???
Same thing happened for her as Biden...they won the popular vote despite being bad candidates!
Our we to believe that Uncle Joe from the basement won the popular vote? Common Man!
I believe that whatever happened with the 2016 election the system was NOT ready for Trump.
The outsider beat them. And the Democrats / Globalists will stop at nothing to win back their power.
This time Biden and his crew tried a different strategy...flipping votes via hack but backing it up with fake mail in ballots.
They changed the rules within the states to harvest, extend the deadlines, protect bad voter rolls, ect, ect.
Keep the counting going as long as possible until victory.
What a sh*t fest the government is.
China imho is in the driving seat this time.
That ensures that the recounts come up lame...no audits involved? Repeat voting, matching signatures, checking vs the voter rolls?
What the Hell is going on? The only thing those machine are good for is counting not verification. Thus minimal differences are found on recounts.
Trump can expose it all. As Sidney Powell explains....there is a revolution INSIDE of the government.

Just take quick read at Trump's executive order in Sept. 2018 about "foreign interference in our elections". Very interesting.
The man has been ready for this. Obama bitching on 60 minutes is not going to stop him.
Under the executive order "the media" could be considered culpable too if proven to have a part in the scam.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... -election/

[HawkBowler 2.0]

I believe that whatever happened with the 2016 election the system was NOT ready for Trump.
The outsider beat them. And the Democrats / Globalists will stop at nothing to win back their power.
This time Biden and his crew tried a different strategy...flipping votes via hack but backing it up with fake mail in ballots.
They changed the rules within the states to harvest, extend the deadlines, protect bad voter rolls, ect, ect.

That looks accurate to me. The socialist takeover wasn't quite ready in 2016 . In fact, if you recall, the media promoted Trump at first because they needed an opposing candidate that they thought was worse than Hillary. Trump racked up free air time on all the networks, including CNN where he wasn't treated like a nut. And yes, this was well after Trump said that Mexicans were rapists and murderers. Then when it was clear that Trump had secured the Republican nomination, the media turned on him in unison and it's been that way ever since.

The Democrats want to go backwards in time and resurrect the Obama agendas. Fortunately, I don't think that will happen... at least not right away, if Biden gets in. The Republicans will only be down a couple of seats in the House. Many Democrats are already pissed about woke politics, so it's unlikely that they will lock arm and arm and do whatever Pelosi tells them. In fact, Pelosi is expected to lose the gavel.

All eyes are on the Senate runoff in Georgia, but that's more than six weeks away. Georgia will have been audited by that point, and several Trump lawsuits will have played their course. My bet is that the two Republicans win outright without having to go through a runoff to beat their socialist competitors.

The Democrats are the ones in a place of desperation. If they don't hold onto their POTUS steal they face the very real possibility of not controlling any of the levers of power.

[bpj]

no, waiting for a court hearing would not be the best path, turning the evidence over to authorities as soon as possible would be. He claims he has evidence that involves national security? If its a national security issue then let the government investigate it, we are talking federal crimes here aren't we? No reason at all to be sitting on it. Giuliani is known for making wild claims like this that he doesn't back up, I am confident this is just another example of it. There is no evidence, and my understanding of that is not a lack of critical thinking, its in fact the opposite.

I don't watch CNN, I get my news from FOX, there is no evidence and there isn't going to be
https://twitter.com/i/status/1328026092976943104

You not accepting evidence isn't the same as there not being any. Hilarious you think putting evidence out publicly would mean anything at all. Thats not how it works.

Lol, Fox, get off tv Donn, it's making you look as clueless as you actually are.

We'll see by January 20th. If I'm wrong I'll apologize for calling you an ostrich for choosing to keep your head in the sand.

[seattlefan-daBronx]

Patriots headed to Georgia tomorrow to march on the Governor's mansion.
Georgia wants to certify a lame recount.
You can have 2 million fraudulent votes and count them twice but they are still bad.
There must be an audit of the damn things!
Governor must call for an emergency session of the legislature.
Doesn't matter. This shit is going to backfire on these commies.

[bpj]

no, waiting for a court hearing would not be the best path, turning the evidence over to authorities as soon as possible would be. He claims he has evidence that involves national security? If its a national security issue then let the government investigate it, we are talking federal crimes here aren't we? No reason at all to be sitting on it. Giuliani is known for making wild claims like this that he doesn't back up, I am confident this is just another example of it. There is no evidence, and my understanding of that is not a lack of critical thinking, its in fact the opposite.

I don't watch CNN, I get my news from FOX, there is no evidence and there isn't going to be
https://twitter.com/i/status/1328026092976943104

You not accepting evidence isn't the same as there not being any. Hilarious you think putting evidence out publicly would mean anything at all. Thats not how it works.

Lol, Fox, get off tv Donn, it's making you look as clueless as you actually are.

We'll see by January 20th. If I'm wrong I'll apologize for calling you an ostrich for choosing to keep your head in the sand.

Posting this screencap to head off those who will want to say, "But you were perfectly fine with Fox News until they called the election for Biden!"

Wrong. I saw Fox News shift when they started bringing on obvious hacks like Donna Breazille.

[IStillLoveTheMs]

no, waiting for a court hearing would not be the best path, turning the evidence over to authorities as soon as possible would be. He claims he has evidence that involves national security? If its a national security issue then let the government investigate it, we are talking federal crimes here aren't we? No reason at all to be sitting on it. Giuliani is known for making wild claims like this that he doesn't back up, I am confident this is just another example of it. There is no evidence, and my understanding of that is not a lack of critical thinking, its in fact the opposite.

I don't watch CNN, I get my news from FOX, there is no evidence and there isn't going to be
https://twitter.com/i/status/1328026092976943104

You not accepting evidence isn't the same as there not being any. Hilarious you think putting evidence out publicly would mean anything at all. Thats not how it works.

Lol, Fox, get off tv Donn, it's making you look as clueless as you actually are.

We'll see by January 20th. If I'm wrong I'll apologize for calling you an ostrich for choosing to keep your head in the sand.

And the judges across the country who have laughed at pretty much everything put forward because it's mostly hearsay from maniacal Trump supporters whose testimony lacks any tangible evidence?

I mean shit... Today, Trump's team threw out a portion of the suit in PA that would work to get the 600,000+ votes tallied after election day canceled. Why? Because they know they've got no chance there.

Instead, they're focusing on Republican poll watchers being "unfairly" treated... a judge already laughed at that claim.

"In Pennsylvania, Trump's lawyers had suggested their poll observers had been shut out of the locations where ballots were being counted. So when the lawyers acknowledged that the observers had, in fact, been permitted within 15 feet of the poll workers, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond, appointed by then-President George W. Bush, appeared baffled."

"I'm sorry, then what's your problem?" Diamond chirped.

Like I said, throwing shit at a wall and hoping it sticks is literally all they have.

[bpj]

You're trusting the same people that told you Trump colluded with Russia and peed on hookers.

You want us to take you seriously for quoting the people who need to cover their tracks?

You libs are hopeless. Just go bury your head until January 20th.

Of course... that's when you'll really want to start burying it after you see Trumps victory rally.