its not about democrats going outside the constitution, its about interpretation of law by the state supreme court, and it doesn't involve 650,000 votesHawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 1:49 amIt would be Democrats going outside the constitution.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 1:22 am
okay, but that wasn't fraud and it wouldn't change the election
Rudy's lawsuit concerns 650,000 ineligible ballots. That would change the state result.
These lawsuits are the jab not the right hook. That's coming with the revelation of the Dominion voting fraud. And yes, for those still doubting, we can call it fraud because the 8,000 or so votes that were switched (that we know about) all went to Biden. Glitches don't have bias.
due to the fact that the state’s court implemented election laws that the state legislature did not approve.
“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit … namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day, but not received until after Election Day,” Dershowitz noted.
“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that, and the state Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic,