Who will win the presidential election

Who will win

Trump
15
65%
Biden
8
35%
There will be a tie and they will be co-president
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 23

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14887
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by bpj » Thu Nov 26, 2020 9:21 pm

Breaking down where we stand for the weak liberal minds to easily understand:
Attachments
Screenshot_20201126-132029_Twitter.jpg
Screenshot_20201126-132029_Twitter.jpg (310.82 KiB) Viewed 581 times

User avatar
HawkBowler 2.0
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by HawkBowler 2.0 » Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:01 pm

Oh, I didn't know that there was a difference between Q and Qanon.

I was half thinking that it could be a CIA disinformation campaign. There's definitely some sick stuff going on between the Clintons, Epstein, Weiner and Hunter laptops. Pedophiles I wouldn't doubt but the Satan worshiping part is hard to imagine. Judging by some of L. Wood's tweets, he saw something, pictures, video, something that made him believe that Trump is up against literal evil... so who knows.

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14887
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by bpj » Fri Nov 27, 2020 12:18 am

Q is a group close to the President, including the President, that made clear that many in government are corrupt. I suspect Kash Patel and Ezra Cohen Watnick are a part in it.

The fake news likes to tell people Q are flat earthers and that JFK Jr. is alive, but I already posted what Q really said about that. Those are the disinformation agents spreading lies. And why?

Yes, Sidney Powell did mention it was going to be Biblical. There are 20 Q posts saying what happens is going to be Biblical, including referencing Giuliani in 2019.

Q is about the destroy the corrupt establishment. That's Q.

Qanon is youtubers and tweeters that think there are hidden numbers and meanings to literally everything.
Attachments
Screenshot_20201126-161148_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20201126-161148_DuckDuckGo.jpg (136.76 KiB) Viewed 571 times
Screenshot_20201126-161134_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20201126-161134_DuckDuckGo.jpg (221.05 KiB) Viewed 571 times

User avatar
seattlefan-daBronx
Posts: 15730
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by seattlefan-daBronx » Fri Nov 27, 2020 2:39 am

I'm telling you.
This will be the great reveal.
Trump will dump and crush his enemies.
The other side will retaliate too.
What they got planned? Who knows?
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass

User avatar
seattlefan-daBronx
Posts: 15730
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by seattlefan-daBronx » Fri Nov 27, 2020 2:40 am

Thanks bjp for explaining the difference between the two groups.
I had no idea they were different.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass

User avatar
seattlefan-daBronx
Posts: 15730
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by seattlefan-daBronx » Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:19 am

https://banned.video/watch?id=5fbbf75845c92148a8b260b0

Check this out. Nothing like being there when this crap went down...
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass

User avatar
HawkBowler 2.0
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by HawkBowler 2.0 » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:20 am

bpj wrote:
Fri Nov 27, 2020 12:18 am
Q is a group close to the President, including the President, that made clear that many in government are corrupt. I suspect Kash Patel and Ezra Cohen Watnick are a part in it.

Q is about the destroy the corrupt establishment. That's Q.
Do you have a source link. I'm not doubting what you're saying, and maybe this is something different than I've come across, but I think we're talking about the same Q.

During the Russian scandal, Q insisted that there wasn't a riff between Trump and Jeff Sessions. "Trust Sessions" was repeated over and over. They were playing a sort of good cop bad cop. The sting operation was coming to take down the deep state... "pain", a word Q often used. This was probably 2017.

That turned out not to be true. Sessions might have been on Trump's side during the campaign, but he was quickly compromised after taking the AG position. He gave the ropes over to Rosenstein who proceeded to bend Trump over a rail. That was proof enough for me that Q was not an insider from the White House. Trump really was pissed at Sessions and wanted him gone.

Q has also said trust Christopher Wray... "Wray of light" LOL... This too I believe to be false. Wray is definitely not on Trump's side. The entire FBI for that matter. Our main federal investigative body let the summer burn with BLM rage. Then they let the woke mob do the vote counting. Like Rudy said... what has to happen for the FBI to do something?

Key question when it comes to Q... if this person or group really has inside access, why speak in riddle and code? The goal seems to be the great awaking, informing the public of the evil sh*t happening at the top... why make it confusing? Why make people go on scavenger hunts and all that?

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14887
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by bpj » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:44 am

HawkBowler 2.0 wrote:
Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:20 am
bpj wrote:
Fri Nov 27, 2020 12:18 am
Q is a group close to the President, including the President, that made clear that many in government are corrupt. I suspect Kash Patel and Ezra Cohen Watnick are a part in it.

Q is about the destroy the corrupt establishment. That's Q.
Do you have a source link. I'm not doubting what you're saying, and maybe this is something different than I've come across, but I think we're talking about the same Q.

During the Russian scandal, Q insisted that there wasn't a riff between Trump and Jeff Sessions. "Trust Sessions" was repeated over and over. They were playing a sort of good cop bad cop. The sting operation was coming to take down the deep state... "pain", a word Q often used. This was probably 2017.

That turned out not to be true. Sessions might have been on Trump's side during the campaign, but he was quickly compromised after taking the AG position. He gave the ropes over to Rosenstein who proceeded to bend Trump over a rail. That was proof enough for me that Q was not an insider from the White House. Trump really was pissed at Sessions and wanted him gone.

Q has also said trust Christopher Wray... "Wray of light" LOL... This too I believe to be false. Wray is definitely not on Trump's side. The entire FBI for that matter. Our main federal investigative body let the summer burn with BLM rage. Then they let the woke mob do the vote counting. Like Rudy said... what has to happen for the FBI to do something?

Key question when it comes to Q... if this person or group really has inside access, why speak in riddle and code? The goal seems to be the great awaking, informing the public of the evil sh*t happening at the top... why make it confusing? Why make people go on scavenger hunts and all that?
qposts.online

I haven't interpreted it as riddle and code, but more leaving breadcrumbs so people follow the path, but have to discover the truths for themselves. Q said many times, telling people isn't enough, sometimes you have to show them.

There has definitely been "Trust Wray" and "Trust Sessions" Q posts.

I've seen Sessions explain that recusing himself was the right move because the liberals would have 100% tried to illegitimize the decision he came to.

Instead, everything was proven false in the end by the liberals puppet, Mueller. Trump and Sessions can wipe their hands clean of it thanks to Sessions decision.

We are going to find out very soon whether we should have trusted Wray and Sessions, but by Wray/Barr delaying any cases they have to file, allowed the election to go on and have the fraud caught and exposed.

I do think Trump wanted Sessions to just steamroll it, but in the end I think it was the right move because they had to disprove Russian collusion, but were any libs going to believe a Sessions-led decision?

Trump said today that fixing the elections is probably the most important thing he will do as president. It does seem imperative given what we're learning has happened.

If Trump stays President and Wray/Barr expose the bad actors in our government, it would be the biggest event in American history.

Personally I think that's where we are within a few months.
Attachments
Screenshot_20201126-224732_DuckDuckGo.jpg

User avatar
seattlefan-daBronx
Posts: 15730
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by seattlefan-daBronx » Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:54 pm

I don't know fellas.
Got a bad feeling.
He is fighting hard in the courts but beyond that I got my doubts now.
Maybe Trump is not the one.
If my gut is right we are screwed six ways from Sunday.
Give me some good news!
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass

User avatar
HawkBowler 2.0
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm

Re: Who will win the presidential election

Post by HawkBowler 2.0 » Fri Nov 27, 2020 4:18 pm

There has definitely been "Trust Wray" and "Trust Sessions" Q posts.

I've seen Sessions explain that recusing himself was the right move because the liberals would have 100% tried to illegitimize the decision he came to.

Instead, everything was proven false in the end by the liberals puppet, Mueller. Trump and Sessions can wipe their hands clean of it thanks to Sessions decision.

We are going to find out very soon whether we should have trusted Wray and Sessions, but by Wray/Barr delaying any cases they have to file, allowed the election to go on and have the fraud caught and exposed.

I do think Trump wanted Sessions to just steamroll it, but in the end I think it was the right move because they had to disprove Russian collusion, but were any libs going to believe a Sessions-led decision?

Trump said today that fixing the elections is probably the most important thing he will do as president. It does seem imperative given what we're learning has happened.
Trump has said that selecting Sessions at AG was one of the worst decisions he's made as president. When Sessions tried to run for Senator again Trump endorsed his opponent.

There was no reason for Sessions to abdicate his role as AG to Rosenstein. Recall that Q also said to trust Rosenstein. If it were Eric Holder under Obama he would have laughed at the notion. It was revealed later that Rosenstein was totally anti-Trump, wanted to wear a wire to take him down.

Post Reply