IMO may be controversial

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 16504
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: IMO may be controversial

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sat Aug 01, 2026 12:32 am

Southpaw773 wrote:
Fri Jul 31, 2026 10:06 pm
This team blows. Blow it up. Trade Cal too. He is really bad now. Can’t live in the past with these guys.
They should strongly consider blowing up the ballpark as well and building a new one that players can hit above .220 in and that doesn't devour doubles and triples.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 82799
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: IMO may be controversial

Post by D-train » Sat Aug 01, 2026 1:51 am

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2026 12:32 am
Southpaw773 wrote:
Fri Jul 31, 2026 10:06 pm
This team blows. Blow it up. Trade Cal too. He is really bad now. Can’t live in the past with these guys.
They should strongly consider blowing up the ballpark as well and building a new one that players can hit above .220 in and that doesn't devour doubles and triples.
Yeah I am sure the money obsessed freak Ebinezer Stanton is planning to flush $2B for more doubles and triples when he doesn't need. lol
dt

Southpaw773
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2022 6:28 am

Re: IMO may be controversial

Post by Southpaw773 » Sat Aug 01, 2026 4:41 am

Just update the park and put in a shorter right field lol.

But in all seriousness the other teams have no problem.

Post Reply