100%
Debate for the Ages Thread
- Walla Walla Dawg II
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
- Location: Southeastern Washington
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
And I just laugh as you're the same people who refer to anyone brown as an Islamic Terrorist.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 8:43 pmI've already called him a racist.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 7:36 pmYeah, so lucky for me.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 7:33 pm
Well, lucky for you, both racism and being prejudges is not against the law.
Hilarious you're coming after me when a poster on this forum just openly posts about hating Jews. But yeah, calling out racist, slummy white people who are being racist and slummy is "lucky for me."
God you're unserious.
I actually posted this picture of his family doing the goose-step back in the 30's.
It's like calling every black person a Baptist Thug, only worse.
And last time I checked it's not Arabs who have a majority ownership of Congress, it's Israel.
And I suppose it's not related that they're pushing a multiple-gender agenda on us, meanwhile their Talmud recognizes 8 genders. It's sure not Muslims that are pushing that on us.
Their charities are behind ushering the illegals past our borders because they want to eliminate whiteness, because they hate us. If you cant see that playing out, you're no better than these braindead libs. We see it throughout the lib agenda.
It's all just coincidence though...
- Walla Walla Dawg II
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
- Location: Southeastern Washington
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
So the Jews have a majority in congress!!!???bpj wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 9:28 pmAnd I just laugh as you're the same people who refer to anyone brown as an Islamic Terrorist.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 8:43 pmI've already called him a racist.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 7:36 pm
Yeah, so lucky for me.
Hilarious you're coming after me when a poster on this forum just openly posts about hating Jews. But yeah, calling out racist, slummy white people who are being racist and slummy is "lucky for me."
God you're unserious.
I actually posted this picture of his family doing the goose-step back in the 30's.
It's like calling every black person a Baptist Thug, only worse.
And last time I checked it's not Arabs who have a majority ownership of Congress, it's Israel.
And I suppose it's not related that they're pushing a multiple-gender agenda on us, meanwhile their Talmud recognizes 8 genders. It's sure not Muslims that are pushing that on us.
Their charities are behind ushering the illegals past our borders because they want to eliminate whiteness, because they hate us. If you cant see that playing out, you're no better than these braindead libs. We see it throughout the lib agenda.
It's all just coincidence though...
As of 2023, there are nine Jewish senators and 26 Jewish members of the House of Representatives serving in the United States Congress. And that is a far cry away from a MAJORITY.
Dude, your post is very telling.
SoB is still a fucking liberal idiot, and you are still a racist. So basically, nothing has changed in the 10 pages of bullshit on this thread. But at least you have another place to post all your twitter and comic bullshit against the Jews.
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
Yes, they have control of a majority.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 9:47 pmSo the Jews have a majority in congress!!!???bpj wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 9:28 pmAnd I just laugh as you're the same people who refer to anyone brown as an Islamic Terrorist.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 8:43 pm
I've already called him a racist.
I actually posted this picture of his family doing the goose-step back in the 30's.
It's like calling every black person a Baptist Thug, only worse.
And last time I checked it's not Arabs who have a majority ownership of Congress, it's Israel.
And I suppose it's not related that they're pushing a multiple-gender agenda on us, meanwhile their Talmud recognizes 8 genders. It's sure not Muslims that are pushing that on us.
Their charities are behind ushering the illegals past our borders because they want to eliminate whiteness, because they hate us. If you cant see that playing out, you're no better than these braindead libs. We see it throughout the lib agenda.
It's all just coincidence though...
As of 2023, there are nine Jewish senators and 26 Jewish members of the House of Representatives serving in the United States Congress. And that is a far cry away from a MAJORITY.
Dude, your post is very telling.
SoB is still a fucking liberal idiot, and you are still a racist. So basically, nothing has changed in the 10 pages of bullshit on this thread. But at least you have another place to post all your twitter and comic bullshit against the Jews.
You can see it play out in the important votes, pull your head out of the sand.
Like funding the "Jewish" leader of Ukraine on one side with the liberal support, and turning around and funding their kinfolk who have taken over Israel and now call themselves "Jews", (as if it's a race, and not a religion) with the full throated support of the conservatives, meanwhile these politicians visit Kyiv and Israel, and no doubt leave with suitcases full of cash.
They've perverted the meaning of what a Jew is to include themselves..
One side is blinded by Ukraine, the other side is blinded by Israel. And they're controlled by the same group.
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
... and ... does anyone want to discuss the debate? Maybe we should have an all-purpose "insults and back to what I always say" thread. So as soon as you decide to insult someone ("libtard", "MAGA idiot", etc.), or talk for the hundredth time about how bad AIPAC is, just leave the current subject thread and move over to all-purpose thread.
As to the debate, I give Harris a C. Dodged a lot of questions, exaggerated a few things, but did a good job goading Trump into getting off topic. So content was light but debating skills were good.
I give Trump a gentleman's D minus. He made some good arguments about the weaknesses of the Biden-Harris record, but he kept going away from that into weird stuff (Harris pays people to come to her rallies? illegal immigrant prisoners getting sex change operations? And how does that make the streets less safe?) A decent focused debater could have hammered Harris over immigration and inflation, but with Trump there was a lot of noise and not much signal.
As to the debate, I give Harris a C. Dodged a lot of questions, exaggerated a few things, but did a good job goading Trump into getting off topic. So content was light but debating skills were good.
I give Trump a gentleman's D minus. He made some good arguments about the weaknesses of the Biden-Harris record, but he kept going away from that into weird stuff (Harris pays people to come to her rallies? illegal immigrant prisoners getting sex change operations? And how does that make the streets less safe?) A decent focused debater could have hammered Harris over immigration and inflation, but with Trump there was a lot of noise and not much signal.
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
It's all related when we're talking politics, Guilford.gil wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 9:59 pm... and ... does anyone want to discuss the debate? Maybe we should have an all-purpose "insults and back to what I always say" thread. So as soon as you decide to insult someone ("libtard", "MAGA idiot", etc.), or talk for the hundredth time about how bad AIPAC is, just leave the current subject thread and move over to all-purpose thread.
As to the debate, I give Harris a C. Dodged a lot of questions, exaggerated a few things, but did a good job goading Trump into getting off topic. So content was light but debating skills were good.
I give Trump a gentleman's D minus. He made some good arguments about the weaknesses of the Biden-Harris record, but he kept going away from that into weird stuff (Harris pays people to come to her rallies? illegal immigrant prisoners getting sex change operations? And how does that make the streets less safe?) A decent focused debater could have hammered Harris over immigration and inflation, but with Trump there was a lot of noise and not much signal.
Unless their support for Israel didn't come up last night....
Of all the country's, why are they special? Especially to us?
Sounds like libs have sided with Harris, conservatives sided with Trump. Surprise!
Do you guys even understand the "fine people" nonsense was a lib lie, or do you still believe it?
- Walla Walla Dawg II
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
- Location: Southeastern Washington
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
What I would have enjoyed...
When Harris (on immigration) said that she is the only one on stage that had prosecuted illegal gang members......and on and on and on.
President Trumps rebuttal should have been:
"Well thank you for prosecuting the illegal gang members in California... but now Ms. Vice-President, you will a lot more to prosecute when you are voted out of office?
When Harris (on immigration) said that she is the only one on stage that had prosecuted illegal gang members......and on and on and on.
President Trumps rebuttal should have been:
"Well thank you for prosecuting the illegal gang members in California... but now Ms. Vice-President, you will a lot more to prosecute when you are voted out of office?
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
The "fine people" quote has been misrepresented by a lot of people on the left, including Harris last night. At its extreme, people have claimed that Trump called Neo-Nazis and white nationalists "very fine people". He did not. Full stop. He said there were "very fine people" on both sides of the protest against taking down monuments to racist traitors.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 10:11 pmIt's all related when we're talking politics, Guilford.gil wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 9:59 pm... and ... does anyone want to discuss the debate? Maybe we should have an all-purpose "insults and back to what I always say" thread. So as soon as you decide to insult someone ("libtard", "MAGA idiot", etc.), or talk for the hundredth time about how bad AIPAC is, just leave the current subject thread and move over to all-purpose thread.
As to the debate, I give Harris a C. Dodged a lot of questions, exaggerated a few things, but did a good job goading Trump into getting off topic. So content was light but debating skills were good.
I give Trump a gentleman's D minus. He made some good arguments about the weaknesses of the Biden-Harris record, but he kept going away from that into weird stuff (Harris pays people to come to her rallies? illegal immigrant prisoners getting sex change operations? And how does that make the streets less safe?) A decent focused debater could have hammered Harris over immigration and inflation, but with Trump there was a lot of noise and not much signal.
Unless their support for Israel didn't come up last night....
Of all the country's, why are they special? Especially to us?
Sounds like libs have sided with Harris, conservatives sided with Trump. Surprise!
Do you guys even understand the "fine people" nonsense was a lib lie, or do you still believe it?
-
- Posts: 7603
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Debate for the Ages Thread
I'd love to talk debate.
People say she didn't talk about policy... did Trump? What policy did Trump bring to the table?
Harris spoke to multiple matters of policy last night: 1. Expand the child tax credit to $6,000 per child to encourage people to have families and thrive in the economy. 2. Build 3 million new homes and offer a $25,000 in down payment assistance to renters who have kept up with their payments for 2 years. 3. Lower prescription drug costs and cap the cost of insulin for all Americans, not just seniors. 4. Reverse the reversal of Roe v Wade. 5. Guarantee IVF. 6. Spoke to being a gun owner, and said she would not take people's guns but instead wants to focus on common sense gun laws. 7. Spoke to a 2-state solution in Gaza while calling for Israel's right to defend itself, but not through the cruel genocide of Palestinians.
That's all I can remember off the top of my head. And you may not agree with it all or any of it... but she brought policy to the table.
All Trump ever says about the economy is, "we're going to have a great economy... a beautiful economy... everyone is going to have big amount of wonderful money... people where I went to school say my plan is amazing... oh... and tariffs." That's what he said last night.
He was pressed on how he would address healthcare costs and he oddly defended Obamacare saying he had no choice but to utilize it and then said he hadn't thought about healthcare because, "I haven't been President in 4 years." And that I have "a concept" for a plan. Really, you railed against Obamacare for the last decade... tried to remove it multiple times... and in 9 years now haven't given ample thought to a replacement!?
Then he got into Haitian immigrants eating people's pets...
He got flustered and upset that she said people were leaving his rallies because they were bored and went on a diatribe about how he has the "biggest and best rallies that anyone has ever seen."
He got upset that people weren't giving him credit for the job he did during Covid...
People say she didn't talk about policy... did Trump? What policy did Trump bring to the table?
Harris spoke to multiple matters of policy last night: 1. Expand the child tax credit to $6,000 per child to encourage people to have families and thrive in the economy. 2. Build 3 million new homes and offer a $25,000 in down payment assistance to renters who have kept up with their payments for 2 years. 3. Lower prescription drug costs and cap the cost of insulin for all Americans, not just seniors. 4. Reverse the reversal of Roe v Wade. 5. Guarantee IVF. 6. Spoke to being a gun owner, and said she would not take people's guns but instead wants to focus on common sense gun laws. 7. Spoke to a 2-state solution in Gaza while calling for Israel's right to defend itself, but not through the cruel genocide of Palestinians.
That's all I can remember off the top of my head. And you may not agree with it all or any of it... but she brought policy to the table.
All Trump ever says about the economy is, "we're going to have a great economy... a beautiful economy... everyone is going to have big amount of wonderful money... people where I went to school say my plan is amazing... oh... and tariffs." That's what he said last night.
He was pressed on how he would address healthcare costs and he oddly defended Obamacare saying he had no choice but to utilize it and then said he hadn't thought about healthcare because, "I haven't been President in 4 years." And that I have "a concept" for a plan. Really, you railed against Obamacare for the last decade... tried to remove it multiple times... and in 9 years now haven't given ample thought to a replacement!?
Then he got into Haitian immigrants eating people's pets...
He got flustered and upset that she said people were leaving his rallies because they were bored and went on a diatribe about how he has the "biggest and best rallies that anyone has ever seen."
He got upset that people weren't giving him credit for the job he did during Covid...