Official Draft pick position watch thread

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17736
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:17 pm

Fact? Again, I just go by what I read
.Getting right to the heart of the issue is the fact that while salary cap sites like OTC have the team projected to have $53.7M of salary cap space for 2023, that number does not include a complete roster, as the team currently has just 33 players signed for next season. Looking at the effective cap space for Seattle, OTC projects the Seahawks to under $30M of available cap space after filling out the roster, paying incentives to players like Geno Smith and Uchenna Nwosu and allocating money for the draft class

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76676
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by D-train » Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:19 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:17 pm
Fact? Again, I just go by what I read
.Getting right to the heart of the issue is the fact that while salary cap sites like OTC have the team projected to have $53.7M of salary cap space for 2023, that number does not include a complete roster, as the team currently has just 33 players signed for next season. Looking at the effective cap space for Seattle, OTC projects the Seahawks to under $30M of available cap space after filling out the roster, paying incentives to players like Geno Smith and Uchenna Nwosu and allocating money for the draft class
Uh yeah all other teams kind of need to do that as well so $30M is still likely about 5th most.
dt

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17736
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:21 pm

Has nothing to do with being relative to other teams, it's the Geno hit if you franchise him, did you bother to open the article?

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76676
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by D-train » Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:32 pm

Yep. Bottom line is that it clearly isn't as cap friendly as a regular multi year deal but I am sure Cap Master JS will be able to find a way to do it if he thinks a one year deal makes more sense for the franchise.
That is not something that would prevent the Seahawks from using the tag, however, it is something that could potentially cause some headaches.
dt

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17736
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:45 pm

That's my point, cap master JS isn't going to create the headaches in the first place, having the restrictions of dedicating a big chunk of his cap to a franchise tag for Geno instead of trying to sign him to a contract. We shall see, I'm betting they try to sign Geno, that's how GS manages his cap

trharder
Posts: 2019
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by trharder » Fri Dec 30, 2022 6:39 pm

They have no intention of paying Geno 30 million for one year. (franchise tag)
They might resign him, but they won't pay him starter money if they do.
If there's no compromise to be had, they will let him walk.

I'm not afraid to be wrong and I'll eat crow publicly if I am.

User avatar
ddraig
Posts: 5416
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:17 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by ddraig » Fri Dec 30, 2022 7:01 pm

D-train wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 11:47 am
Elite QBs start in year one. There are none available so you tag him. Don't draft a QB that is so lowly regarded you don't think he can start until 2025.
That's why I'd talk to Houston about trading our #12 pick this year for their first round pick next year. They probably won't be much better next year and there are four really good QB's coming out in 2024. And that would give us two First Round picks next year instead of this year. If Geno doesn't want to sign a one or two year contract, let him shop around and go pick up a place holder QB for next season.

SeattleAddict
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:25 pm

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by SeattleAddict » Fri Dec 30, 2022 7:42 pm

trharder wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:31 am
Donn Beach wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:09 am
PFF has them taking Anthony Richardson at 12
.General manager John Schneider hit a home run with last year’s draft class, and the Seahawks got a stud in Carter with the third pick of this mock. While Geno Smith isn’t currently under contract for 2023, he’s played well enough to earn a contract to return and start next season. The potential for Smith to return would allow the Seahawks to draft and develop Richardson without forcing him into action before he’s ready. While he’s only a one-year starter, he has a unique blend of dual-threat traits and immense upside
I'm in - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWAY9VMOe0I
Have any of you ever actually watched Anthony Richardson play?? Not just selected highlights, but actually watched him? He is sooooooo bad... at least as a QB. He's a great runner, and has a cannon for an arm, so yeah, you can make an impressive highlight reel, but he can't throw for shit. REALLY bad at everything you want a QB to do EXCEPT scrambling and throwing the ball 70 yards. He completes less than 50% of his passes against any team you've heard of!!! His last game he was 9-27. You can look up his numbers, but the eye test is even worse - unless you look at him as a TE or RB.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76676
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by D-train » Fri Dec 30, 2022 7:54 pm

SeattleAddict wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 7:42 pm
trharder wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:31 am
Donn Beach wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:09 am
PFF has them taking Anthony Richardson at 12

I'm in - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWAY9VMOe0I
Have any of you ever actually watched Anthony Richardson play?? Not just selected highlights, but actually watched him? He is sooooooo bad... at least as a QB. He's a great runner, and has a cannon for an arm, so yeah, you can make an impressive highlight reel, but he can't throw for shit. REALLY bad at everything you want a QB to do EXCEPT scrambling and throwing the ball 70 yards. He completes less than 50% of his passes against any team you've heard of!!! His last game he was 9-27. You can look up his numbers, but the eye test is even worse - unless you look at him as a TE or RB.
Yeah if he is taken top 5 he prob gives Jamarcus Russell or Leaf a run for their money as all time busts. imo
dt

trharder
Posts: 2019
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Official Draft pick position watch thread

Post by trharder » Fri Dec 30, 2022 8:20 pm

SeattleAddict wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 7:42 pm
trharder wrote:
Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:31 am
I'm in - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWAY9VMOe0I
Have any of you ever actually watched Anthony Richardson play?? Not just selected highlights, but actually watched him? He is sooooooo bad... at least as a QB. He's a great runner, and has a cannon for an arm, so yeah, you can make an impressive highlight reel, but he can't throw for shit. REALLY bad at everything you want a QB to do EXCEPT scrambling and throwing the ball 70 yards. He completes less than 50% of his passes against any team you've heard of!!! His last game he was 9-27. You can look up his numbers, but the eye test is even worse - unless you look at him as a TE or RB.
LOL. easy there, addict.
I had just got done saying I wanted a QB that can run. That guy can run and he's big enough to not get killed running.
I did glance at his stats and saw they are not as rosy as his highlight tape, which is impressive. I also don't like that he abandoned his team for
their bowl.
"EXCEPT scrambling and throwing the ball 70 yards."
There were many games where RW did exactly this an the Seahawks won. so slow down with your duel-threat QB prejudice.

FYI about me, I think draft pick research, speculation and prediction is ridiculous as a fan. I was saying that this is the type
of QB I want.

Post Reply