We're sounding spoiled.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76015
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by D-train » Mon Oct 21, 2019 3:17 pm

ThePro wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:07 pm
Logainismyhero wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:52 pm
If anyone thinks this D will get us to the playoffs, then you're drinking way too much of the koolaid.

This D is atrocious and the O isn't good enough to cover up that fact.
That atrocious D gave up 16 points. Ravens got 14 off of turnovers. Try again.
To the best offense in the NFL and according to the announcers, by far the best player in NFL history.
dt

Michael K.
Posts: 12772
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by Michael K. » Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:15 pm

I heard on KIRO this morning that only Miami has fewer tackles for loss than us. That surprised me...especially since we utilize a base defense with three good LBs on the field more than anyone in football.

As fast as Jackson is, three LBs, regardless of how good they are, might not have been the answer. But, then what is? You would think that having LBs on the field should be your best bet to stop the run. But does anyone remember watching one of Jackson's plays where you thought we just blew it?

I don't know how long this kid can continue to play this brand of football, but he was something else to watch yesterday. Our offense needed to step up, and we seemed to struggle a lot after the pick six. I'm not sure if it was the weather, if they got extra caution after the pick six, or a combo of both. But it just wasn't happening.

I really think the game may have been different with Duane Brown. Clayton pointed out this morning that running wide on the Ravens is a possibility, but the interior of their defense is stout. It sounds like Fant struggled, not just in pass pro, but when we tried to attack the edge on the ground. Maybe we control the game with the run a little more if Duane plays?

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by ThePro » Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:36 pm

How come they didn't use Shaquem as a spy yesterday? He could have shut down Jackson single handedly.

DavidGee24
Posts: 9136
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by DavidGee24 » Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:24 pm

Logainismyhero wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:49 pm
They gave up 200 yards on the ground. The D is horrible. Try again.
They didn't give up 200 yards on the ground. Dropbacks that result in the quarterback taking off running are rushing yards by definition only, but in fact they're passing plays that end up as rushing yards. Jackson got about 90 yards rushing on pass plays yesterday so they really only gave up 110. Try again.

And yes, I know you're just a troll who isn't sincerely making observations but rather trying to get a rise out of people. Your 8-8 bet yesterday probably saved you from getting banned.

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14174
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Tue Oct 22, 2019 2:32 am

The D's main job was to contain Jackson because every pass play can turn into a run play with him. They failed at that, but they did well in the red zone to minimize the damage. There aren't many teams that can overcome two turnovers that result in TD's. The worst thing is, i heard Hugh Millen explaining that on the pick-6 play Metcalf had beat his man on the opposite side of the field by 3 yards and it would have been an easy TD pass.

Logainismyhero
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:54 am

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by Logainismyhero » Tue Oct 22, 2019 2:54 am

DavidGee24 wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:24 pm
Logainismyhero wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:49 pm
They gave up 200 yards on the ground. The D is horrible. Try again.
They didn't give up 200 yards on the ground. Dropbacks that result in the quarterback taking off running are rushing yards by definition only, but in fact they're passing plays that end up as rushing yards. Jackson got about 90 yards rushing on pass plays yesterday so they really only gave up 110. Try again.

And yes, I know you're just a troll who isn't sincerely making observations but rather trying to get a rise out of people. Your 8-8 bet yesterday probably saved you from getting banned.
Stat box says 199 yds rusing by the Ravens....so.....

57reasons
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 4:19 am
Location: 98118

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by 57reasons » Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:30 am

ThePro wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:36 pm
How come they didn't use Shaquem as a spy yesterday? He could have shut down Jackson single handedly.
^^^
props to you sir, props to you. :lol:

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by ThePro » Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:33 am

57reasons wrote:
Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:30 am
ThePro wrote:
Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:36 pm
How come they didn't use Shaquem as a spy yesterday? He could have shut down Jackson single handedly.
^^^
props to you sir, props to you. :lol:
Finally someone got it... :lol:

DavidGee24
Posts: 9136
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by DavidGee24 » Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:39 am

Logainismyhero wrote:
Tue Oct 22, 2019 2:54 am
Stat box says 199 yds rusing by the Ravens....so.....
Which means something only to people who don't know anything about football...so...

ThePro
Posts: 3460
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 2:12 am

Re: We're sounding spoiled.

Post by ThePro » Tue Oct 22, 2019 12:38 pm

DavidGee24 wrote:
Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:39 am
Logainismyhero wrote:
Tue Oct 22, 2019 2:54 am
Stat box says 199 yds rusing by the Ravens....so.....
Which means something only to people who don't know anything about football...so...
To add to that is there much shame in giving up ONLY a 100 yards on scramble plays to a QB that Michael Vick said he was "In awe of"

I just can't put that on the defense sorry.

Post Reply