A wash? Are you insane?bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:21 amMaybe that's why you're missing about 15-20 winsIStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:20 amI predicted 70 wins based off the 25 man roster. A 25-man that has proven to be utterly dreadful.bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:16 amYeah, Marm was my first choice!
You're the second biggest loser I've ever encountered behind weebs. Such a tool. And always wrong, it's almost funny how tight you'll cling to anything, even when it's as simple as, dude, you predicted 70 wins with pretty much the same 40 man roster. You suck.
I'm sure if they were on pace for 70 wins it would be all going according to how you saw it. Such a dunce.
If you based 86 wins off a 40 man that featured 3x relievers who were pig shit for every other team they've pitched for you're even dumber than I thought.It has nothing to do with you expecting nothing from the core...
The relievers have been a wash. You're clinging to it like it's life and death, but it's just making you look foolish.
You're calling a 2.04 ERA over 84 innings from 3 pitchers who weren't expected to do shit a "wash? " That's gotta be tops in fucking baseball for 3 relievers... much less 3 guys who weren't even on a team's opening day roster.
The team clings onto 1-run wins as the only reason they're even in contention. These 3 pitchers are quite literally the saving grace of this ball club.
Good God...