Offseason Plans

ice99
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:49 am

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by ice99 » Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:52 pm
ice99 wrote:
Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:27 pm
Yes, but they had negative WAR players like Long and Marmolejos. They also had Sheffield and McCaughan making starts. I don't see Marco only having 0.6 WAR, and I see Gilbert having more innings this time around to accumulate a higher WAR. I also don't see Kelenic having negative WAR, given his Sept.

I'll revisit this when the initial Fangraphs projections come out for the FAs, FWIW.
Your 9 man lineup and your 5 man rotation are not going to play 100% of your innings. you still have to fill out the roster with guys who will get some playing time due to injury, days off etc. Every team has multiple negative WAR players even the Giants who won 106 games had them.
I expect less negative WAR from the bench and 7th starters. Fangraphs WAR doesn't capture all the results of the season.

Let's do it by delta. They won 90 games. Adding Semien over Seager is 1.5 fWAR. Adding Gausman over Anderson is 3.3 fWAR. Letting Kelenic improve to 0 WAR is 0.7 fWAR. The delta makes it 95.5 WAR.

Edit: I wish I could add.
Last edited by ice99 on Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SeattleSportsRUs
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:06 am

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by SeattleSportsRUs » Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:54 pm
SeattleSportsRUs wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:44 pm
As much as people want to point to the Rays as the model you should follow if you want to win a World Series - I call bullshit.

The Rays are a worse 2001 Mariners. Built to win a lot of regular season games, not built to take out the 3rd best offense in the league over a mandatory 5-game series.

This is why the M's need to sign superstars. They carry you.
they went to a WS, not sure how that is worse than the 2001 Mariners
Oh, because you're into particulars, the "2021 Rays" are a worse 2001 Mariners.

And I don't count 2020 as being worth much of anything. A 60-game season with no fans in the stands, might as well have been an exhibition season.

I haven't been on this board very long, but I get the feeling you get off on being really nitpicky. You get in little post battles with a lot of people over literally nothing.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76764
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:13 pm

SeattleSportsRUs wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:54 pm
SeattleSportsRUs wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:44 pm
As much as people want to point to the Rays as the model you should follow if you want to win a World Series - I call bullshit.

The Rays are a worse 2001 Mariners. Built to win a lot of regular season games, not built to take out the 3rd best offense in the league over a mandatory 5-game series.

This is why the M's need to sign superstars. They carry you.
they went to a WS, not sure how that is worse than the 2001 Mariners
Oh, because you're into particulars, the "2021 Rays" are a worse 2001 Mariners.

And I don't count 2020 as being worth much of anything. A 60-game season with no fans in the stands, might as well have been an exhibition season.

I haven't been on this board very long, but I get the feeling you get off on being really nitpicky. You get in little post battles with a lot of people over literally nothing.
:lol: :!:
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76764
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:57 pm

dt

User avatar
Coeurd’Alene J
Posts: 5690
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:56 am

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by Coeurd’Alene J » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:20 pm

D-train wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:13 pm
SeattleSportsRUs wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:54 pm


they went to a WS, not sure how that is worse than the 2001 Mariners
Oh, because you're into particulars, the "2021 Rays" are a worse 2001 Mariners.

And I don't count 2020 as being worth much of anything. A 60-game season with no fans in the stands, might as well have been an exhibition season.

I haven't been on this board very long, but I get the feeling you get off on being really nitpicky. You get in little post battles with a lot of people over literally nothing.
:lol: :!:
I just blew pop all over the dashboard

:cry: :o :lol:

Captain 97
Posts: 3352
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:26 pm

ice99 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:52 pm
ice99 wrote:
Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:27 pm
Yes, but they had negative WAR players like Long and Marmolejos. They also had Sheffield and McCaughan making starts. I don't see Marco only having 0.6 WAR, and I see Gilbert having more innings this time around to accumulate a higher WAR. I also don't see Kelenic having negative WAR, given his Sept.

I'll revisit this when the initial Fangraphs projections come out for the FAs, FWIW.
Your 9 man lineup and your 5 man rotation are not going to play 100% of your innings. you still have to fill out the roster with guys who will get some playing time due to injury, days off etc. Every team has multiple negative WAR players even the Giants who won 106 games had them.
I expect less negative WAR from the bench and 7th starters. Fangraphs WAR doesn't capture all the results of the season.

Let's do it by delta. They won 90 games. Adding Semien over Seager is 1.5 fWAR. Adding Gausman over Anderson is 3.3 fWAR. Letting Kelenic improve to 0 WAR is 0.7 fWAR. The delta makes it 95.5 WAR.

Edit: I wish I could add.
They were not a 90 Win team by WAR though. They were the single most overachieving team in the history of the game. By both run differential and WAR, they should have won about 75 games. Its foolish to think that that will happen again. So take your delta from a baseline of 75 and that puts them at about .500 with those changes. Maybe they play above their pythagorean again because of the strong Bullpen but its not going to be by 15 games.

SeattleSportsRUs
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2021 2:06 am

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by SeattleSportsRUs » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:32 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:26 pm
ice99 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:56 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:52 pm


Your 9 man lineup and your 5 man rotation are not going to play 100% of your innings. you still have to fill out the roster with guys who will get some playing time due to injury, days off etc. Every team has multiple negative WAR players even the Giants who won 106 games had them.
I expect less negative WAR from the bench and 7th starters. Fangraphs WAR doesn't capture all the results of the season.

Let's do it by delta. They won 90 games. Adding Semien over Seager is 1.5 fWAR. Adding Gausman over Anderson is 3.3 fWAR. Letting Kelenic improve to 0 WAR is 0.7 fWAR. The delta makes it 95.5 WAR.

Edit: I wish I could add.
They were not a 90 Win team by WAR though. They were the single most overachieving team in the history of the game. By both run differential and WAR, they should have won about 75 games. Its foolish to think that that will happen again. So take your delta from a baseline of 75 and that puts them at about .500 with those changes. Maybe they play above their pythagorean again because of the strong Bullpen but its not going to be by 15 games.
Yes, if you're under the impression that the young players they have won't improve or that adding quality players to the lineup won't increase the WAR of everyone around.

I don't think anyone is under the impression that the M's are a winning baseball team next year if the current players don't take big strides forward.

That's quite literally what the future trajectory of this team is predicated on. Experts think that the M's young guys will turn into stars, in which case the 2021 WAR totals don't really matter when projecting how good the M's will be.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76764
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:43 pm

Yep and JRod is now expected to be on the OD roster so hopefully both he and JK will put up positive WAR.
dt

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14822
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by bpj » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:54 pm


User avatar
D-train
Posts: 76764
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Offseason Plans

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:56 pm

bpj wrote:
Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:54 pm
Nice. He's back on our list!
dt

Post Reply