Alec Baldwin

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 13845
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by bpj » Wed Oct 27, 2021 8:32 am

Sounds right
Attachments
Screenshot_20211026-232919_Gallery.jpg
Screenshot_20211026-232919_Gallery.jpg (225.15 KiB) Viewed 1026 times
Screenshot_20211026-232813_Gallery.jpg
Screenshot_20211026-232813_Gallery.jpg (489.88 KiB) Viewed 1026 times
Screenshot_20211026-232532_Gallery.jpg
Screenshot_20211026-232532_Gallery.jpg (358.72 KiB) Viewed 1026 times

SpokaneCoug
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 6:45 pm
Location: Woodinville, WA

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by SpokaneCoug » Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:39 am

Cute - more memes from Twitter where you get your information. Clown show man. Totes adorbs.

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 13845
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by bpj » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:51 am

SpokaneCoug wrote:
Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:39 am
Cute - more memes from Twitter where you get your information. Clown show man. Totes adorbs.
Troll.

User avatar
ddraig
Posts: 5190
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:17 am

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by ddraig » Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:06 am

Saw this during the afternoon today.

"'As for the “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, a spokesperson said on her behalf: “Hannah was hired on two positions on this film, which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer” and noted, “She fought for training, days to maintain weapons and proper time to prepare for gunfire but ultimately was overruled by production and her department.'”

Looks to me as if they had elevated an unqualified individual to do a critical job and when she explained that she felt uncomfortable with some of the procedures, the "producers" (Alec Baldwin?) overruled her recommendations. My guess is that the producers (Baldwin, et. al.) will try to pin the problem on her being young and inexperienced rather than taking the responsibility for making her do some things she was uncomfortable doing. Does that absolve Ms. Gutierrez-Reed from her negligence? No. She should have quit. But because Baldwin and the other Producers have money and power, they will try to explain it was all her fault!

She should be allowed to continue her chosen career under close supervision for five years. Baldwin and the "producers" should be held full responsible for Involuntary Manslaughter. Their involvement should preclude any of them ever again be allowed to participate in a film than includes firearms.

And my own personal opinion? Screw Alec Baldwin!

Captain 97
Posts: 3038
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by Captain 97 » Wed Dec 01, 2021 9:14 pm

Now Baldwin is saying he didn't pull the trigger. Apparently he wants us to believe the gun fired itself.

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 13845
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by bpj » Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:08 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 9:14 pm
Now Baldwin is saying he didn't pull the trigger. Apparently he wants us to believe the gun fired itself.
Must've been made by the same people that made the SUV that drove through the crowd

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 73235
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by D-train » Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:08 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Wed Dec 01, 2021 9:14 pm
Now Baldwin is saying he didn't pull the trigger. Apparently he wants us to believe the gun fired itself.
Well that SUV drove itself through Christmas parade so very possible.
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 73235
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by D-train » Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:09 pm

Jinx!!!! :lol:
dt

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 13845
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by bpj » Thu Dec 02, 2021 6:09 am

..
Attachments
Screenshot_20211201-220809_Gallery.jpg
Screenshot_20211201-220809_Gallery.jpg (299.28 KiB) Viewed 966 times

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: Alec Baldwin

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Fri Dec 03, 2021 10:46 pm

He didn't pull the trigger....he released the hammer that hit the firing pin and the bullet went out the barrel.
We know the rest.

It's still a shame that someone had to die before he can figure out how to use a revolver.

It sounds like he was holding a single-action revolver.
The way to shoot a single-action revolver is the cock the hammer, then pull the trigger. I'd assume he never pulled the hammer back far enough to lock it and upon releasing the hammer, the gun went off.

Back in the 1970's and 1980's, Ruger had some issues with their revolvers and did a full recall on the oldies. It had to do with the hammer (when in the locked position) being hit and releasing on their own, thus striking the firing pin and boom. Now all revolvers have a slide that comes up when the hammer is pulled back that protects the firing pin from this accident.

Post Reply