DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:51 pm
Donn Beach wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2019 10:04 am
isn't a WAR worth about $7 mil?...$7 mil is pretty much a drop in the bucket in terms of ML spending Not sure what you mean by doing nothing, they do have to run players out there, they are gonna cost something.
If you're paying someone seven million dollars and he's producing a 1.0 WAR, you're getting ripped off. Even worse if he's producing 2.0 WAR at 14 million and 3.0 WAR at 21 million. Remember, an average player over a full season is about 1.8 WAR.
2 WAR is just over average. They shouldn't pay a penny over minimum for players that aren't capable of a 5 WAR season.
Fill 90% of your positions with average guys like Shed Long and Marco Gonzales, then spend your wad on guys that can give you 5 WAR from one roster spot.
Pay only for surplus WAR (over 2) not what your prospects should be capable of coming up and doing. Shed Long vs. Dee Gordon is a perfect example. Not only would Shed be better, but then we'd have $12M to spend towards a real ballplayer like Cole.
Spending $7-12M each on guys that play to the same results as a $500K player is a recipe for losing. As we've seen.