GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

DavidGee24
Posts: 9460
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by DavidGee24 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 10:58 pm

Mariners win! We're HEROES!!!

This was one of those games that wasn't anywhere close to what the final score indicated.

Two out of three from the Madres, gotta like that! Hopefully the Crockies can help us out again tonight. GOOOOOO CROCKIES

Seattle or Bust
Posts: 9665
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Seattle or Bust » Wed Aug 27, 2025 11:04 pm

Andres 4 seamer this year has an XSLG of .627... last year, .392.

He's got an expected BA+SLG of over 1.000 on that pitch.

It has been sitting 96-98... I wonder if he's gotta get back up over 100.

Seattle or Bust
Posts: 9665
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Seattle or Bust » Wed Aug 27, 2025 11:32 pm

Note on Bazardo... he's increased his sinker usage by almost double compared to last year and is throwing it 35% of the time. He has reduced the use of 4-seamer by a similar margin, seemingly swapping use of the pitches.

The sinker has a positive run value of 10 and is why he's been so good.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17521
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Donn Beach » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:18 am

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Wed Aug 27, 2025 8:48 pm
I'm surprised they haven't put Cal at lead-off. And half you guys would support that move too.
Kyle Schwarber has been the Phillies leadoff hitter, not so much this season i guess

Pharmabro
Posts: 6503
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 8:32 am

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Pharmabro » Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:14 am

:D

XpertDBA
Posts: 995
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:35 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by XpertDBA » Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:58 pm

Doesn't it make infinitely more sense to put Julio #2 and Cal #3 in the lineup?

I've never understood why they are inverted in our lineup. Makes absolutely zero sense to me.

Seattle or Bust
Posts: 9665
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Seattle or Bust » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:10 pm

XpertDBA wrote:
Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:58 pm
Doesn't it make infinitely more sense to put Julio #2 and Cal #3 in the lineup?

I've never understood why they are inverted in our lineup. Makes absolutely zero sense to me.
Julio has been a far better hitter in the 3-hole vs 2-hole in his career.

.850 vs .740 OPS.

It would actually be better if Julio led off. When he is the first batter of a game he has a 1.139 slash.

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14529
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:52 pm

Sounds like Woo was really pissed off about being taken out of the game with 2 outs in the inning. I think this was a case where a little more flexibility with regard to pitch count limits would be a good thing.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17521
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Donn Beach » Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:54 pm

seems to me cal is hitting pretty high in the lineup. And it would seem to me the lineup should be a function of runs generated, how it works as it flips. I am gonna guess dipoto is running calculations for how the lineup should work as opposed to dan scratching his butt deciding to hit Cal second. So even though it seems odd to me I think they are operating with more information than we have. Here's a lineup optimization tool online. You enter the lineup statistically and then it runs thousands of simulated games. I have to guess Dipoto has come up with something along those lines

https://myanalyticsguy.com/

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 17521
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: GT 134 Woo vs Darvish

Post by Donn Beach » Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:04 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:52 pm
Sounds like Woo was really pissed off about being taken out of the game with 2 outs in the inning. I think this was a case where a little more flexibility with regard to pitch count limits would be a good thing.
is there a link?...I poked around for a minute for one, found this that i wasn't aware of, they come up with these endless records these days but still, that's pretty impressive
The New York Mets spoiled a historic afternoon for Bryan Woo, defeating the Seattle Mariners 3-1 at Citi Field behind rookie Nolan McLean’s stellar debut.

Although the game didn’t go Seattle’s way, Woo broke a record that had stood for nearly six decades. He became the first pitcher in MLB history to open a season with 24 consecutive starts of at least six innings while issuing no more than two walks, surpassing Hall of Famer Juan Marichal’s 1968 streak.

Post Reply