Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Michael K.
Posts: 13688
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Michael K. » Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:55 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:19 pm
Yeah, I am telling you that wasn't the narrative. There was never a narrative in the first place, the team won ten games. If he had decided to keep grubb nobody would be second guessing that decision. But for whatever reason MM decided to move on from Grubb, that was his decision, he's the coach. After making that decision he made another decision, that was to hire Kubiak, far as I am concerned the two are not even related. One was because he didn't want the guy on his staff, the other was because he did. Everybody can sit around scratching their asses pondering on why he canned Grubb but its MM that knows the answer, its his team, he gets to pick his staff. I honestly don't understand the hard part about that

When did I say he couldn't pick his staff? I laid it out multiple times this off season why I thought Grubb was a scapegoat, and why anyone that thought we should just run the fucking football was crazy. I pointed it out again after Sunday's fucking shit show. Have a problem with it, I don't give a shit, but this is a fucking forum to talk Seahawks. The Seahawks made a decision this off season that all they needed was a new Guard and some new coaches and the entire offense was gonna be fine. Instead? They set the game of football back four decades, and had to watch while Grampa Pete and Geno set the world on fire.
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:19 pm
this is the deal, you go on and on not agreeing with MM firing Grubb. I don't see where you get a vote. It's his team, his staff, he makes those decisions. He's not going to work with a guy on his staff he doesn't want on his staff. It's like you arguing you have decided to divorce your wife and i complaining about it. You don't like MM fine, you don't like his style of football fine, but get over his deciding who is on his staff, its his staff
So, if you don't have a vote on who plays, stays or coaches? You can't discuss it here. Got it. I'm out then.

And are you fucking kidding me? If there was a forum on the internet about my wife and my relationship, and we got a divorce? I'd assume people would talk about it, ON THAT FUCKING FORUM. No? That was dumb dude.

User avatar
douche
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:41 pm

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by douche » Wed Sep 10, 2025 6:11 pm

Isn't it hilariously hypocritical for Donn to tell Michael to, 'get over it'. That it's MM's staff and his call.

Yet Donn says,
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 3:18 pm
Jody Allen needs to sell the team

The only appropriate response is, 'Get over it, Donn, it's Jodi's call. :lol:'

Michael K.
Posts: 13688
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Michael K. » Wed Sep 10, 2025 6:15 pm

douche wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 6:11 pm
Isn't it hilariously hypocritical for Donn to tell Michael to, 'get over it'. That it's MM's staff and his call.

Yet Donn says,
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 3:18 pm
Jody Allen needs to sell the team

Get over it, Donn, it's Jodi's call. :lol:
Haha, I responded in kind on that topic.

I guess I'll await Sunday morning, when this forum can be available again. Until then? What is there to discuss?

Everyone get ready Sunday morning to tell us if you are attending the game or watching on TV. What will you drink and what will you eat. Am I missing any of the other things about a Seahawk game that we "have a vote" on?

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 15172
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:12 pm

There was more to the decision than how the team looked on the field, and even that is up for debate. I think that is what DB was getting at. If Grubb wasn't on board with a longer term vision of how the offense should be run then why would Macdonald keep him around? You have to recall that Grubb was hired late in the period where staff hirings are made and by then virtually all the other notable candidates were gone.

Michael K.
Posts: 13688
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Michael K. » Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:38 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:12 pm
There was more to the decision than how the team looked on the field, and even that is up for debate. I think that is what DB was getting at. If Grubb wasn't on board with a longer term vision of how the offense should be run then why would Macdonald keep him around? You have to recall that Grubb was hired late in the period where staff hirings are made and by then virtually all the other notable candidates were gone.
No one is arguing that. Are you going to tell me that there many comments in here about how Grubb needed to just run the ball? Are you going to tell me there weren't many calling for his head? Shit, several guys watched that fucking waste of shoulder pad material Howell play QB and blamed the fucking OC? Stink was on 710 every week blaming the OC. MM and Schneider all but said it themselves, and actually I am pretty sure Mr Beach himself posted a comment by Schneider after the draft defending only adding one O Lineman by saying they have what they need, they needed to scheme them up better. Well? Either he is full of shit, which makes sense since he appears to have no clue what a real O Line looks like, or he was wrong about Kubiak, because that was a dogshit offensive performance.

To say it's not worth mentioning how one OC had to coach a game with Sam Fucking Howell at QB to have a game as putrid as Kubiak just did? Is flat out sticking your head in the sand. Which, IMO? Is exactly what JS is counting on. He'll probably get five more years for it.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 78055
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by D-train » Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:54 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 2:55 pm
D-train wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 2:05 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 1:13 pm
The 49ers scored inside the two minute warning. At that time? Darnold had 88 yards passing. In the fucking year 2025, this offense had 88 yards passing in 58 plus minutes of football. Yep, nothing to see here, no worries...it's only one game. Losing the first one is less important than later. If we miss the playoffs by a game they will round up and let us in because our loss was week one, when it's still pre-season. Every other team in the division was ready to play football. They are all 1 and 0. I wonder if they realize they wasted all of that energy winning a Pre-Season game?

But Mike, the defense. Well? Go check the defensive stats. Of course the 9ers are ranked high, they played Kubiak's Kids. The Hawks are 25th in Total Defense. Everyone in the Division is ranked higher. So? The "bright spot" from Sunday is that there are 7 Defenses in the entire NFL that gave up more yards than we did on Sunday.

This team STUNK. And all this fan base does is make excuses. No wonder they extended a GM after missing the playoffs 3 out of four years. This team is 1 and 4 in the playoffs the past 8 years. They extended the GM after that and everyone in here threw a party. Again, I should have seen this coming.
I didn't throw a party. I wondered what unholy acts Jody made JS perform to get it. Like I said, since 2016 the Mariners have won more playoff games than the Hawks. Let that sink in.
heaven help she might sell the team, they are throwing parties in portland over her selling the Blazers, why can't she sell the seahawks
How many years ago has it been since Carzano reported that a sale was imminent? lol
dt

Donn Beach
Posts: 18678
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Donn Beach » Wed Sep 10, 2025 10:32 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:55 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:19 pm
Yeah, I am telling you that wasn't the narrative. There was never a narrative in the first place, the team won ten games. If he had decided to keep grubb nobody would be second guessing that decision. But for whatever reason MM decided to move on from Grubb, that was his decision, he's the coach. After making that decision he made another decision, that was to hire Kubiak, far as I am concerned the two are not even related. One was because he didn't want the guy on his staff, the other was because he did. Everybody can sit around scratching their asses pondering on why he canned Grubb but its MM that knows the answer, its his team, he gets to pick his staff. I honestly don't understand the hard part about that

When did I say he couldn't pick his staff? I laid it out multiple times this off season why I thought Grubb was a scapegoat, and why anyone that thought we should just run the fucking football was crazy. I pointed it out again after Sunday's fucking shit show. Have a problem with it, I don't give a shit, but this is a fucking forum to talk Seahawks. The Seahawks made a decision this off season that all they needed was a new Guard and some new coaches and the entire offense was gonna be fine. Instead? They set the game of football back four decades, and had to watch while Grampa Pete and Geno set the world on fire.
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 5:19 pm
this is the deal, you go on and on not agreeing with MM firing Grubb. I don't see where you get a vote. It's his team, his staff, he makes those decisions. He's not going to work with a guy on his staff he doesn't want on his staff. It's like you arguing you have decided to divorce your wife and i complaining about it. You don't like MM fine, you don't like his style of football fine, but get over his deciding who is on his staff, its his staff
So, if you don't have a vote on who plays, stays or coaches? You can't discuss it here. Got it. I'm out then.

And are you fucking kidding me? If there was a forum on the internet about my wife and my relationship, and we got a divorce? I'd assume people would talk about it, ON THAT FUCKING FORUM. No? That was dumb dude.
A scapegoat about what? They had a successful season, won ten games, what was he scapegoated about?

Donn Beach
Posts: 18678
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by Donn Beach » Wed Sep 10, 2025 10:34 pm

douche wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 6:11 pm
Isn't it hilariously hypocritical for Donn to tell Michael to, 'get over it'. That it's MM's staff and his call.

Yet Donn says,
Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 3:18 pm
Jody Allen needs to sell the team

The only appropriate response is, 'Get over it, Donn, it's Jodi's call. :lol:'
Actually trying to please Michael, he doesn't seem to feel there is enough accountability. It would need to come from the owner wouldn't it

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 78055
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by D-train » Thu Sep 11, 2025 12:34 am

Scouting report from my buddy from Pittsburg. Says Steelers D sucks
Screenshot 2025-09-10 173229.png
Screenshot 2025-09-10 173229.png (48.55 KiB) Viewed 2547 times
dt

User avatar
douche
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:41 pm

Re: Postmortem - Hawks v Chardonnay Nation

Post by douche » Thu Sep 11, 2025 2:51 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Wed Sep 10, 2025 10:34 pm
Actually trying to please Michael, he doesn't seem to feel there is enough accountability. It would need to come from the owner wouldn't it
Last time I checked, Jody was the owner. She's the one who signed JS, and he's the one who hired MM. They're all accountable to her.

In terms of selling the team, does anyone know what the timeline is? And a new owner doesn't necessarily mean it will be better. Remember the Ken Behring years?

Post Reply