If you know how to read you will know. Both numbers are in this thread.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:41 pmWhat's Donovan's trade value? What does a Miller for Donovan trade look like?
D-Trains Off season plan
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
dt
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 18678
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
You edited your original post... So about equal value, Miller seems like an interesting trade piece to meD-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:50 pmIf you know how to read you will know. Both numbers are in this thread.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:41 pmWhat's Donovan's trade value? What does a Miller for Donovan trade look like?
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
Oh, sorry about that.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:02 amYou edited your original post... So about equal value, Miller seems like an interesting trade piece to meD-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:50 pmIf you know how to read you will know. Both numbers are in this thread.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:41 pmWhat's Donovan's trade value? What does a Miller for Donovan trade look like?
dt
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
D-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:04 pmSure I get that. Too bad we don't have a ownership group that wants to win.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:42 pmI just don't see a roster with an unknown at 1B and Williamson at 3B complimenting the pitching staff in the way we need it to.
I'd like to add more sure things and keep the staff where it is than add Skubal and inevitably be trying to figure out what we're going to do at 3B and 1B at the AS break like we do every year.
I don't have faith Williamson or Okamoto at all.
This is the old “opportunity cost” thing that comes up we could hope and pray that Williamson’s offensive improvement where he had a .314 average and an .854 OPS at season’s end. Or we could spend prospects to bring in: Brendan D, CJ, etc, etc or do we spend 20M -40M a year on Geno or Bregman.
Look you might be able to mine out a decent 3B performance from Ben, Rivas, Bliss, Colt, or Arroyo but if you go Ben 1st how long do you let him ride if he has an 79 OPS+? Maybe after 3.5 Months rotating failures through Colt comes up and performs. Are you still in playoff position by then?
The same opportunity cost kinda kills when we say look we got Skubal for X Y and Z, But now I want to add an elite BP guy: but now how do I fill 1B, 2B, and 3B?
I get what he is saying but I think there are avenues available and multiple ways to get the needed parts with the resources we have available. Just like the multiple offseason blueprints demonstrate.
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 18678
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
Pharmabro wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:53 amD-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:04 pmSure I get that. Too bad we don't have a ownership group that wants to win.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:42 pm
I just don't see a roster with an unknown at 1B and Williamson at 3B complimenting the pitching staff in the way we need it to.
I'd like to add more sure things and keep the staff where it is than add Skubal and inevitably be trying to figure out what we're going to do at 3B and 1B at the AS break like we do every year.
I don't have faith Williamson or Okamoto at all.
This is the old “opportunity cost” thing that comes up we could hope and pray that Williamson’s offensive improvement where he had a .314 average and an .854 OPS at season’s end. Or we could spend prospects to bring in: Brendan D, CJ, etc, etc or do we spend 20M -40M a year on Geno or Bregman.
Look you might be able to mine out a decent 3B performance from Ben, Rivas, Bliss, Colt, or Arroyo but if you go Ben 1st how long do you let him ride if he has an 79 OPS+? Maybe after 3.5 Months rotating failures through Colt comes up and performs. Are you still in playoff position by then?
The same opportunity cost kinda kills when we say look we got Skubal for X Y and Z, But now I want to add an elite BP guy: but now how do I fill 1B, 2B, and 3B?
I get what he is saying but I think there are avenues available and multiple ways to get the needed parts with the resources we have available. Just like the multiple offseason blueprints demonstrate.
This is what I argued before, it wouldn't be about hoping and praying Williamson develops into a hitter. It's going with what he already is, a 2-2.5 WAR defensive 3rd baseman, a league average player. The deal being that seems like a pretty firm floor for him. I doubt his defense craters. You could go spend $10-15 MIL on a superior hitting player and be lucky they give you 2-2.5.WAR anyway. That gives you savings to apply elsewhere.
I wouldn't dismiss league average , even the dodgers, Yankees or whoever would be happy to get league average at some positions. And Williamson seems like a pretty safe league average at a modest cost.
And I don't care about 3rd being a power position. I think the four infield positions have leveled out. First has become more defensively oriented as SS has become more offensive. You can play for defense or offense at any of them these days
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
Sad truth is we have too many holes to adequately fill them all given the expected payroll. Some with have to be filled with duct tape and gauze pads as per usual.Pharmabro wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:53 amD-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:04 pmSure I get that. Too bad we don't have a ownership group that wants to win.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:42 pm
I just don't see a roster with an unknown at 1B and Williamson at 3B complimenting the pitching staff in the way we need it to.
I'd like to add more sure things and keep the staff where it is than add Skubal and inevitably be trying to figure out what we're going to do at 3B and 1B at the AS break like we do every year.
I don't have faith Williamson or Okamoto at all.
This is the old “opportunity cost” thing that comes up we could hope and pray that Williamson’s offensive improvement where he had a .314 average and an .854 OPS at season’s end. Or we could spend prospects to bring in: Brendan D, CJ, etc, etc or do we spend 20M -40M a year on Geno or Bregman.
Look you might be able to mine out a decent 3B performance from Ben, Rivas, Bliss, Colt, or Arroyo but if you go Ben 1st how long do you let him ride if he has an 79 OPS+? Maybe after 3.5 Months rotating failures through Colt comes up and performs. Are you still in playoff position by then?
The same opportunity cost kinda kills when we say look we got Skubal for X Y and Z, But now I want to add an elite BP guy: but now how do I fill 1B, 2B, and 3B?
I get what he is saying but I think there are avenues available and multiple ways to get the needed parts with the resources we have available. Just like the multiple offseason blueprints demonstrate.
dt
-
Seattle or Bust
- Posts: 10472
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-free-agent ... 23-mlb-1-B
A panel of MLB experts predict the M's to land Murakami
Not that, that means anything.
A panel of MLB experts predict the M's to land Murakami
Not that, that means anything.
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
This is kind of how I see it.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:22 amPharmabro wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:53 am
This is the old “opportunity cost” thing that comes up we could hope and pray that Williamson’s offensive improvement where he had a .314 average and an .854 OPS at season’s end. Or we could spend prospects to bring in: Brendan D, CJ, etc, etc or do we spend 20M -40M a year on Geno or Bregman.
Look you might be able to mine out a decent 3B performance from Ben, Rivas, Bliss, Colt, or Arroyo but if you go Ben 1st how long do you let him ride if he has an 79 OPS+? Maybe after 3.5 Months rotating failures through Colt comes up and performs. Are you still in playoff position by then?
The same opportunity cost kinda kills when we say look we got Skubal for X Y and Z, But now I want to add an elite BP guy: but now how do I fill 1B, 2B, and 3B?
I get what he is saying but I think there are avenues available and multiple ways to get the needed parts with the resources we have available. Just like the multiple offseason blueprints demonstrate.
This is what I argued before, it wouldn't be about hoping and praying Williamson develops into a hitter. It's going with what he already is, a 2-2.5 WAR defensive 3rd baseman, a league average player. The deal being that seems like a pretty firm floor for him. I doubt his defense craters. You could go spend $10-15 MIL on a superior hitting player and be lucky they give you 2-2.5.WAR anyway. That gives you savings to apply elsewhere.
I wouldn't dismiss league average , even the dodgers, Yankees or whoever would be happy to get league average at some positions. And Williamson seems like a pretty safe league average at a modest cost.
And I don't care about 3rd being a power position. I think the four infield positions have leveled out. First has become more defensively oriented as SS has become more offensive. You can play for defense or offense at any of them these days
Re: D-Trains Off season plan
Yep that is exactly what I did. Also saves money with Oka instead of Naylor so we can trade for Skubal.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:22 amPharmabro wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 12:53 am
This is the old “opportunity cost” thing that comes up we could hope and pray that Williamson’s offensive improvement where he had a .314 average and an .854 OPS at season’s end. Or we could spend prospects to bring in: Brendan D, CJ, etc, etc or do we spend 20M -40M a year on Geno or Bregman.
Look you might be able to mine out a decent 3B performance from Ben, Rivas, Bliss, Colt, or Arroyo but if you go Ben 1st how long do you let him ride if he has an 79 OPS+? Maybe after 3.5 Months rotating failures through Colt comes up and performs. Are you still in playoff position by then?
The same opportunity cost kinda kills when we say look we got Skubal for X Y and Z, But now I want to add an elite BP guy: but now how do I fill 1B, 2B, and 3B?
I get what he is saying but I think there are avenues available and multiple ways to get the needed parts with the resources we have available. Just like the multiple offseason blueprints demonstrate.
This is what I argued before, it wouldn't be about hoping and praying Williamson develops into a hitter. It's going with what he already is, a 2-2.5 WAR defensive 3rd baseman, a league average player. The deal being that seems like a pretty firm floor for him. I doubt his defense craters. You could go spend $10-15 MIL on a superior hitting player and be lucky they give you 2-2.5.WAR anyway. That gives you savings to apply elsewhere.
I wouldn't dismiss league average , even the dodgers, Yankees or whoever would be happy to get league average at some positions. And Williamson seems like a pretty safe league average at a modest cost.
And I don't care about 3rd being a power position. I think the four infield positions have leveled out. First has become more defensively oriented as SS has become more offensive. You can play for defense or offense at any of them these days
dt