Who will win the presidential election
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15833
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
IStillLoveTheMs...be good brother. Nice talking politics. Got to go work now. Have a good one!
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Who will win the presidential election
A great thread with all the little things conservatives are just supposed to overlook-HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:10 pmEveryone should just take a deep breath and realize that we're watching a plan play out on the part of the Democrats.
1. Take political advantage of the pandemic to depress the economy and drive down Trump's poll numbers.
2. Use the pandemic to institute new laws that will drive up mail-in balloting, increasing the opportunity for fraud and chaos.
3. Delay the election results until enough Democrat votes can be manufactured to over take Trump.
4. Declare victory while confusion and allegations swirl in the public
Now we're moving on to:
5. Stop the counting/auditing
6. Demand Trump concede
7. Activism in the streets
https://twitter.com/RubyRockstar333/sta ... 28161?s=19
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Yep and I was simply pointing out a fact. Not making fun of her. lolseattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:50 pm"public figures" are game! but you gil...I love you!gil wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:45 pmSomeone wrote above that it is good to be in a place where people can disagree without calling each other names and making fun of personal characteristics. I've been saying this to people I know (in person and online) who are anti-Trump for more than 4 years. I think it is time for me to say this to people here who are pro-Trump. Please stop. You can disagree with people without making fun of them.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:11 pm
Exactly. She is so unbearably phony. At least her laughter fits with somebody getting away with highway robbery.![]()
dt
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
What doesn't align with reality is the Dems and their controlled media.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:37 pmYou really struggle with reading comprehension.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:27 pmTrump tweets this morning: I WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT
Couple hours later the MSM calls it for Biden. Why now?
Biden, as I said, surpassed the 35K .5% threshold in Penn that negates the recount. That's when the media outlets called it.
Biden also just took Nevada. Increasing his electoral count even further past the 270 threshold.
Trump's tweets do not align with reality.
Interference in the election is actually a real concept. Only it's not foreign, it's domestic. The Dems used the media, pollsters and big tech to influence the election. Nobody even doubts that.
You're confidence in PA vote totals is misplaced. You do realize that thousands of ballots will be coming off the board, right? SCOTUS Alito ordered all ballots arriving after election night to be sequestered, whether counted or not. There's no way that the Dems made up a 700,000 vote deficit without finding new votes. A 35,000 vote lead is nothing.
If you've been watching your favorite media, you'll notice that they're not talking about the raw numbers for the election. We're not seeing the normal breakdown between gender and races. They're not talking about Trump's improved numbers with blacks and Hispanics. They're not talking about abnormally large turnouts in Dem battle ground cities. Why? The numbers don't make sense.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Any bets they already "intermingled" the late votes? Or the ones they say came late are 90% Trump votes?
-
IStillLoveTheMs
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 11:29 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I'm just going to stop trying to debunk you. Every post is filled with nothing but lies or half-truths.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:57 pmWhat doesn't align with reality is the Dems and their controlled media.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:37 pmYou really struggle with reading comprehension.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:27 pmTrump tweets this morning: I WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT
Couple hours later the MSM calls it for Biden. Why now?
Biden, as I said, surpassed the 35K .5% threshold in Penn that negates the recount. That's when the media outlets called it.
Biden also just took Nevada. Increasing his electoral count even further past the 270 threshold.
Trump's tweets do not align with reality.
Interference in the election is actually a real concept. Only it's not foreign, it's domestic. The Dems used the media, pollsters and big tech to influence the election. Nobody even doubts that.
You're confidence in PA vote totals is misplaced. You do realize that thousands of ballots will be coming off the board, right? SCOTUS Alito ordered all ballots arriving after election night to be sequestered, whether counted or not. There's no way that the Dems made up a 700,000 vote deficit without finding new votes. A 35,000 vote lead is nothing.
If you've been watching your favorite media, you'll notice that they're not talking about the raw numbers for the election. We're not seeing the normal breakdown between gender and races. They're not talking about Trump's improved numbers with blacks and Hispanics. They're not talking about abnormally large turnouts in Dem battle ground cities. Why? The numbers don't make sense.
When Biden is sworn in, you'll still be riding this horse and pivoting to more lies and half-truths.
It's over. Trump lost.
BPJ already building his insane conspiracy case I see.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Okay, point out the sentences I've written and explain how they were lies. If you do a good job I just might believe you.I'm just going to stop trying to debunk you. Every post is filled with nothing but lies or half-truths.
When Biden is sworn in, you'll still be riding this horse and pivoting to more lies and half-truths.
You're becoming see no, hear no, say no evil. You don't want to look, and really for your own good, maybe you shouldn't.
We already have prima facia evidence of fraud. Pittsburgh and Philadelphia denied Republicans the opportunity to watch ballots being counted. You sound like you were old enough to remember Florida 2000... recall the Dems and Repubs each sitting side by side counting each ballots. The Republicans were brazenly denied this right which is clearly against the law. Look up the term "spoliation of evidence" -- the charge given to those who destroy or withhold information.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
My guess is probably yours. Yes. fraudulent votes are most likely shuffled and mixed with valid votes.
One point of confidence is that there is a document for each vote and they can be recounted manually. If this Dominion software glitch they found in both MI and GA, taking votes from Trump and giving votes to Biden (every time), was widely used the manual vote will expose more 'glitches."
It may not come down to that, though. Big data, what they're calling the Bedford Law can statistically prove fraudulent activity. That data and proof can be used in the courts.
Trump says that they will go on the attack on Monday. That means they must have evidence of fraudulent activity.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I've read (I think 538/Nate Silver) that Trump did better in Philadelphia than he did in 2016. It's in the Philly suburbs and Allegheny County (Pittsburgh etc.) in which Biden did better than Clinton.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:57 pmWhat doesn't align with reality is the Dems and their controlled media.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:37 pmYou really struggle with reading comprehension.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:27 pmTrump tweets this morning: I WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT
Couple hours later the MSM calls it for Biden. Why now?
Biden, as I said, surpassed the 35K .5% threshold in Penn that negates the recount. That's when the media outlets called it.
Biden also just took Nevada. Increasing his electoral count even further past the 270 threshold.
Trump's tweets do not align with reality.
Interference in the election is actually a real concept. Only it's not foreign, it's domestic. The Dems used the media, pollsters and big tech to influence the election. Nobody even doubts that.
You're confidence in PA vote totals is misplaced. You do realize that thousands of ballots will be coming off the board, right? SCOTUS Alito ordered all ballots arriving after election night to be sequestered, whether counted or not. There's no way that the Dems made up a 700,000 vote deficit without finding new votes. A 35,000 vote lead is nothing.
If you've been watching your favorite media, you'll notice that they're not talking about the raw numbers for the election. We're not seeing the normal breakdown between gender and races. They're not talking about Trump's improved numbers with blacks and Hispanics. They're not talking about abnormally large turnouts in Dem battle ground cities. Why? The numbers don't make sense.