Who will win the presidential election
-
DavidGee24
- Posts: 10247
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: Who will win the presidential election
That's what's so funny about these people, they want Trump out so bad that they fake-celebrate the victory of a guy who 100 years from now will be one of those guys you forget about and skip over when naming the US presidents ("Let's see, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, Schwarzenegger...").
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 18998
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Who will win the presidential election
paper owned by Sheldon Adelson calling bs on Trump's fraud charges
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/e ... e-2181720/
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/e ... e-2181720/
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was established in 2018 (legislation signed by President Trump) with oversight by the Department of Homeland Security. Yesterday, CISA and state voting officials issued a statement that says (in bold), "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
The CISA statement concludes, "While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/jo ... l-election
The CISA statement concludes, "While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/jo ... l-election
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Funny how the NY Times comes out with their fact check after Trump tweets about Dominion. They don't explain the 6,000 votes that were changed in two different states. They just want you to trust them. No evidence of fraud. Just keep repeating that.
None of what's happening is normal. Why do we have a handful states that are still counting? A better question is why are they stalling?
Pulling off the steal is one thing, covering up the tracks is another.
None of what's happening is normal. Why do we have a handful states that are still counting? A better question is why are they stalling?
Pulling off the steal is one thing, covering up the tracks is another.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The swamp is deep.gil wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:47 pmThe Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was established in 2018 (legislation signed by President Trump) with oversight by the Department of Homeland Security. Yesterday, CISA and state voting officials issued a statement that says (in bold), "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
The CISA statement concludes, "While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/jo ... l-election
Same reason the intelligence agencies never let people know Trump was innocent of Russian collusion when they knew throughout his entire impeachment sham.
Same reason 50 retired intelligence officers supported Biden.
Not much to see with CISA that hasn't shown to be true everywhere in government. Swamprats.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20201113-090017_Parler.jpg (280.23 KiB) Viewed 637 times
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I agree that Biden is just a forgettable blip on the POTUS chain. But if he does get in he might be the most consequential in terms of pushing the country into socialism. We all know that he's horribly compromised by China. We all know that he's colluding with EU socialists.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:58 amThat's what's so funny about these people, they want Trump out so bad that they fake-celebrate the victory of a guy who 100 years from now will be one of those guys you forget about and skip over when naming the US presidents ("Let's see, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, Schwarzenegger...").
People don't know what they're cheering for... Biden as president? Getting rid of Trump? Maybe they think life will go back to normal. It wont be Joe in charge: https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status ... started%2F
Last edited by HawkBowler 2.0 on Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Exactly... and did we ever receive the truth from the NY Times during Russia Russia Russia? One anonymous BS source after another... all connected to Obama deep state people.bpj wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:02 pm
The swamp is deep.
Same reason the intelligence agencies never let people know Trump was innocent of Russian collusion when they knew throughout his entire impeachment sham.
Same reason 50 retired intelligence officers supported Biden.
Not much to see with CISA that hasn't shown to be true everywhere in government. Swamprats.
Now we're supposed to believe the NY Times? Sorry, not gonna happen. They need to explain voting irregularities. The job of journalism is not to shoot down conspiracy theories or cover for elite politicians. That's all the MSM has done for five years. It's all they know how to do... which is why they continue now.
#digitalsoldiers
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The path of danger was created by Obama. Worst president ever.Obama said Trump’s claims “appear to be motivated, in part, because the president doesn’t like to lose, and never admits loss. I’m more troubled by the fact that other Republican officials, who clearly know better are going along with this, are humoring him in this fashion. It is one more step in delegitimizing, not just the incoming Biden administration, but democracy generally, and that’s a dangerous path.”
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15833
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Couple things on my mind after a few days to stew...
1. They have a whistleblower that works for Dominion software. Great catch.
Why? She herself witnessed "irregularities" fraud. She also knows and may have access to the "patch" that was done to many voter machines the day before the election. Why is that key? Several witnesses attest that they saw the internet icon functioning on these units when it against the law to be connected while counting. IMHO an algorithm was run to flip votes possibly remotely. The computer geeks for the government will find the trail.
By the way back in 2015 these software were found to have been corrupted. We just never heard about the story. Texas came out and said this is why they didn't go with the Dominion software because it was proven to be hackable.
2. When this goes to the Supreme Court...and it will...what will these pansy-ass Judges do?
The have imho two choices with both favorable outcomes for Trump but will have different consequences going forward:
a. Declare recounts and audits for the states in question due to evidence of fraud.
Result = Favors Trump he gets to 270 and exposes the Dem Dems and will change voter laws / clean house for future elections.
But, puts the Supreme Court in extremely unpopular light and they normally don't like to be the reason a President is elected.
b. Kick the can down the road. Say there is so much evidence of voter fraud that the election is moot / invalid.
Sadly, I feel this is what they are going to do. This way they can say they are just following the process as outlined in the Constitution.
State electors will have to elect the President. Favors Trump. 39 electors are Republican. 19 are Democrat.
Senate will select the Vice President.
Damage = Gets the Supreme Court off the hook but also lets the Dems and fraudsters off the line also.
Biden is compromised. Court battles favor Trump. Uncle Joe will concede to avoid investigation. i.e. Hillary Clinton. It's why she will never see the inside of a jail cell. Enjoy retirement Joe. Looking forward to the great show of support Trump will get tomorrow in D.C.
1. They have a whistleblower that works for Dominion software. Great catch.
Why? She herself witnessed "irregularities" fraud. She also knows and may have access to the "patch" that was done to many voter machines the day before the election. Why is that key? Several witnesses attest that they saw the internet icon functioning on these units when it against the law to be connected while counting. IMHO an algorithm was run to flip votes possibly remotely. The computer geeks for the government will find the trail.
By the way back in 2015 these software were found to have been corrupted. We just never heard about the story. Texas came out and said this is why they didn't go with the Dominion software because it was proven to be hackable.
2. When this goes to the Supreme Court...and it will...what will these pansy-ass Judges do?
The have imho two choices with both favorable outcomes for Trump but will have different consequences going forward:
a. Declare recounts and audits for the states in question due to evidence of fraud.
Result = Favors Trump he gets to 270 and exposes the Dem Dems and will change voter laws / clean house for future elections.
But, puts the Supreme Court in extremely unpopular light and they normally don't like to be the reason a President is elected.
b. Kick the can down the road. Say there is so much evidence of voter fraud that the election is moot / invalid.
Sadly, I feel this is what they are going to do. This way they can say they are just following the process as outlined in the Constitution.
State electors will have to elect the President. Favors Trump. 39 electors are Republican. 19 are Democrat.
Senate will select the Vice President.
Damage = Gets the Supreme Court off the hook but also lets the Dems and fraudsters off the line also.
Biden is compromised. Court battles favor Trump. Uncle Joe will concede to avoid investigation. i.e. Hillary Clinton. It's why she will never see the inside of a jail cell. Enjoy retirement Joe. Looking forward to the great show of support Trump will get tomorrow in D.C.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
According to Rudy they have 'multiple' whistle blowers that have come forward in addition to Melissa Carone. What she has to say is compelling:1. They have a whistleblower that works for Dominion software. Great catch.
https://youtu.be/tDEUUK6yRBY
This is evidence of fraud. A real person who's filed an affidavit. If she's lying she could go to jail.
The NY Times doesn't mention the witnesses that have come forward. It's yet another disinformation campaign. What it tells me is that Dominion is right over the target. The left is scared about this one. Even Obama spoke up the other day, and he's usually quiet about these things.