Who will win the presidential election
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 18134
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Who will win the presidential election
losers?...Donald Trump is the loser...Why that is so difficult to grasp is beyond me. It has nothing to do with who I might have voted for, he lost the election
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 11:29 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
No, the evidence doesn't really exist when it's brought to a judge 50+ times and then laughed out of the court you DUMB SHIT.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:28 pmIf evidence is not heard in court does it really exist?
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Only that hasn't happened.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:30 pm
No, the evidence doesn't really exist when it's brought to a judge 50+ times and then laughed out of the court you DUMB SHIT.
Why didn't SCOTUS hear the case coming from Texas?
Because if they hear the case they have to review the UNDISPUTABLE evidence of fraud and over turn the election.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Keep saying that. I'm sure by the thousanth time it will come true.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:29 pmlosers?...Donald Trump is the loser...Why that is so difficult to grasp is beyond me. It has nothing to do with who I might have voted for, he lost the election
It's not true yet....
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 11:29 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
You could easily answer your own question if you had a brain.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:32 pmOnly that hasn't happened.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:30 pm
No, the evidence doesn't really exist when it's brought to a judge 50+ times and then laughed out of the court you DUMB SHIT.
Why didn't SCOTUS hear the case coming from Texas?
Because if they hear the case they have to review the UNDISPUTABLE evidence of fraud and over turn the election.
You claim the evidence of fraud is right in front of our noses. The Supreme Court not only chose to not hear the case, they didn't even take a second to consider it.
Why is that? Because it's an absolute fucking joke, there's no evidence, and as such, they're appalled that it's even being presented to them.
Get it now?
Last edited by IStillLoveTheMs on Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Have said the same thing since the election- Only date that matters is January 20th.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:21 pmIt doesn't have to do with anything. It's one of his many moronic pivots that he uses until he gets too hot and bothered... then it's,Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:19 pmwhat does that have to do with anything?... I could be the biggest Trump supporter on the face of the earth, I could believe Trump was railroaded. But what does that have to do with the fact he lost the election? To be a Trump supporter you have to convince yourself Biden isn't going to be inaugurated Jan 20th?
"OH YEAH! WELL JUST WAIT FOR WHAT'S COMING!!!"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fraud has been proven, you braindead libs just have no idea where to find it behind the iron curtain of your media.
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 11:29 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Yeah, the fraud has been proven to a bunch of toothless hicks, gullible evangelicals, right-wing nutters... basically anyone who fits under the category of: MORON. Not to anyone with a brain or anyone who matters.bpj wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:36 pmHave said the same thing since the election- Only date that matters is January 20th.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:21 pmIt doesn't have to do with anything. It's one of his many moronic pivots that he uses until he gets too hot and bothered... then it's,Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:19 pm
what does that have to do with anything?... I could be the biggest Trump supporter on the face of the earth, I could believe Trump was railroaded. But what does that have to do with the fact he lost the election? To be a Trump supporter you have to convince yourself Biden isn't going to be inaugurated Jan 20th?
"OH YEAH! WELL JUST WAIT FOR WHAT'S COMING!!!"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fraud has been proven, you braindead libs just have no idea where to find it behind the iron curtain of your media.
The only Republicans politicians who cling to this shit are total grifters who are positioning themselves to be favored among the loons.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 18134
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Who will win the presidential election
what isn't true?...that Trump lost the election?...sorry my friend, but the truth is he lost it, that is the truth. Its interesting to me the continual denial. I thought once the electoral college was held it would settle things. I will assume that when Biden is sworn in as president that will settle it finallyHawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:33 pmKeep saying that. I'm sure by the thousanth time it will come true.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:29 pmlosers?...Donald Trump is the loser...Why that is so difficult to grasp is beyond me. It has nothing to do with who I might have voted for, he lost the election
It's not true yet....
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I get that you've been watching too much Don Lemon.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:36 pm
You could easily answer your own question if you had a brain.
You claim the evidence of fraud is right in front of our noses. The Supreme Court not only chose to not hear the case, they didn't even take a second to consider it.
Why is that? Because it's an absolute fucking joke, there's no evidence, and as such, they're appalled that it's even being presented to them.
Get it now?
SCOTUS refused the Texas case on procedure not merit. Why doesn't that make sense to you?
Instead, you concoct some fantasy that the SCOTUS justices reviewed all the statistical evidence, the hundreds of affidavits, ect. No.. they didn't review any of that.
What you want... in your hysterical cry baby way... is for proof beyond a doubt before a court will even hear a lawsuit.
Childish I tell you.
Don't worry.. proof beyond a doubt is coming... it's already out in the open if you care to look.
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 11:29 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Says every televangelist to their flock of gullible sheeps.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:43 pmI get that you've been watching too much Don Lemon.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:36 pm
You could easily answer your own question if you had a brain.
You claim the evidence of fraud is right in front of our noses. The Supreme Court not only chose to not hear the case, they didn't even take a second to consider it.
Why is that? Because it's an absolute fucking joke, there's no evidence, and as such, they're appalled that it's even being presented to them.
Get it now?
SCOTUS refused the Texas case on procedure not merit. Why doesn't that make sense to you?
Instead, you concoct some fantasy that the SCOTUS justices reviewed all the statistical evidence, the hundreds of affidavits, ect. No.. they didn't review any of that.
What you want... in your hysterical cry baby way... is for proof beyond a doubt before a court will even hear a lawsuit.
Childish I tell you.
Don't worry.. proof beyond a doubt is coming... it's already out in the open if you care to look.
Yeah, and why did they refuse the case on procedure? Oh right, because it was laughable... not something even worth considering for 15 seconds.
Last edited by IStillLoveTheMs on Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.