Hard to say. IMO, to get an A, they would have needed an impact big up front. Maybe they got him, maybe they didn't. As of right now I think they filled some depth up front. I scored them high because they kicked ass at other spots, but hold off on a solid A.D-train wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pmWho should they have taken?Michael K. wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 2:14 pmI agree somewhat. I went A -, because while they didn’t get that game wrecker upfront, they didn’t reach, and they did address D Line in FA.Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 2:49 pmB+ actually.
They didn't get that obvious interior D-lineman....that they sorely needed.
But the rest was great.
If I was actually publishing my grade for consumption other than in here? I might have dove real deep into who they took where and who they could have gotten. Giving them an A - hardly seems like a slap in the face though.