Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Poll ended at Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:48 am

A
11
65%
B
5
29%
C
1
6%
D
0
No votes
F
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 17

Michael K.
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Michael K. » Thu May 04, 2023 7:45 pm

D-train wrote:
Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Tue May 02, 2023 2:14 pm
Walla Walla Dawg II wrote:
Sun Apr 30, 2023 2:49 pm
B+ actually.
They didn't get that obvious interior D-lineman....that they sorely needed.
But the rest was great.
I agree somewhat. I went A -, because while they didn’t get that game wrecker upfront, they didn’t reach, and they did address D Line in FA.
Who should they have taken?
Hard to say. IMO, to get an A, they would have needed an impact big up front. Maybe they got him, maybe they didn't. As of right now I think they filled some depth up front. I scored them high because they kicked ass at other spots, but hold off on a solid A.

If I was actually publishing my grade for consumption other than in here? I might have dove real deep into who they took where and who they could have gotten. Giving them an A - hardly seems like a slap in the face though.

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 13719
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm

D-train wrote:
Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pm
Who should they have taken?
JALEN?

Michael K.
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Michael K. » Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm
D-train wrote:
Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pm
Who should they have taken?
JALEN?
No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.

Gametime
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Gametime » Fri May 05, 2023 9:26 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm
D-train wrote:
Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pm
Who should they have taken?
JALEN?
No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.
My issue is taking a tiny CB (5'11 181 pounds) who is classified as a "Hitter" How will he withstand it at the NFL Level. I can understand not taking Jalen, but taking such a small and light CB???? Kelly Jennings was the same exact size. Hope he can withstand. But, he is such a small CB height and weight.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75528
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by D-train » Fri May 05, 2023 10:17 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm
D-train wrote:
Wed May 03, 2023 12:10 pm
Who should they have taken?
JALEN?
No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.
Yeah that was my point. If he was a non POS human the he would have been the obvious choice but I am happy they went bpa over a non wrecker.
dt

SeattleAddict
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:25 pm

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by SeattleAddict » Sun May 07, 2023 12:57 am

D-train wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 10:17 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm


JALEN?
No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.
Yeah that was my point. If he was a non POS human the he would have been the obvious choice but I am happy they went bpa over a non wrecker.
He may well be lazy and a dumbass, but he's 21(?) and pretty sure most of us could be described in those same terms at that age. Not really fair to call him a POS human. Asshats like D. Watson, A. Hernandez, R. Carruth and M. Vick deserve that, would even accept it for Ray Rice, OJ or Ray Lewis if you don't trust juries, but doing dumb shit as a 20-something isn't on that level.

User avatar
Cascade Kid
Posts: 894
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:11 am

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Cascade Kid » Sun May 07, 2023 1:33 am

Gametime wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 9:26 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu May 04, 2023 8:56 pm


JALEN?
No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.
My issue is taking a tiny CB (5'11 181 pounds) who is classified as a "Hitter" How will he withstand it at the NFL Level. I can understand not taking Jalen, but taking such a small and light CB???? Kelly Jennings was the same exact size. Hope he can withstand. But, he is such a small CB height and weight.
He's classified as a great coverage and zone DB that happens to play downhill when the run comes out onto the edge. Sherman did the same thing.

SeattleAddict
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:25 pm

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by SeattleAddict » Sun May 07, 2023 1:54 am

Gametime wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 9:26 pm

My issue is taking a tiny CB (5'11 181 pounds) who is classified as a "Hitter" How will he withstand it at the NFL Level. I can understand not taking Jalen, but taking such a small and light CB???? Kelly Jennings was the same exact size. Hope he can withstand. But, he is such a small CB height and weight.
Numbers sometimes lie. Compare the two:
jennings.jpg
jennings.jpg (60.38 KiB) Viewed 350 times
witherspoon.jpg

Gametime
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Gametime » Sun May 07, 2023 6:18 am

Under 6 foot and 181 pounds is still tiny.

Gametime
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: Grade the Seahawks 2023 Draft

Post by Gametime » Sun May 07, 2023 6:25 am

Cascade Kid wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 1:33 am
Gametime wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 9:26 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 6:07 am


No thanks. He might decide to work hard, get in shape and be worth the number five pick. But, IMO? Way to much risk.
My issue is taking a tiny CB (5'11 181 pounds) who is classified as a "Hitter" How will he withstand it at the NFL Level. I can understand not taking Jalen, but taking such a small and light CB???? Kelly Jennings was the same exact size. Hope he can withstand. But, he is such a small CB height and weight.
He's classified as a great coverage and zone DB that happens to play downhill when the run comes out onto the edge. Sherman did the same thing.
Yes he did. At 6’4 and 195 pounds. Not barley 5’112 and 181.

I do like his coverage ability and toughness, just concerned with him wanting to continue being a hitter at 181 pounds against NFL players. Secondly, he also never ever played against Ohio States stud receivers.

We will see. We need good cover corners if Adans ever gets back, cause we know he can’t cover. :)

Post Reply