Win Prediction contest

[rockycola]

I am pulling this down here since we are about down to it. I will update this after every game. The record is what is required the final 16 games to win. JP is down to a .705 OPS. I don't need to worry about it. Nor do several others that are the only ones to pic a certain win total.

DavidGee24 ................ 97 .......... .715 Eliminated
Vogelbomb ..................96 .......... .698 Eliminated
bpj ............................... 95 .......... .700 Eliminated
mostonmike ................94........... .699 16-0
Pharmabro .................. 93........... .740 15-1
Lonnie in Colorado ..... 93 ........... ? 15-1
Double Mocha Man .... 92 .......... .721 14-2
desbcoach: ................. 92 .......... .686 14-2
rockycola: .................... 91 .......... .681 13-3
techmc ........................ 91 .......... .713 13-3
seattlefan-daBronx ..... 91 .......... .702 13-3
GL_Storm .................... 90 .......... .700 12-4
Mesully11 ................... 90 .......... .673 12-4
ddraig .......................... 90 .......... .704 12-4
Millikin ......................... 89 .......... .730 11-5
Juliooooo .................... 89 .......... .745 ~ JP 11-5
Sibelius Hindemith ..... 88 .......... .698 10-6
D_train ......................... 87 .......... .711 9-7
Captain 97 .................. 86 .......... .688 8-8
Michael K. ................... 86 .......... .685 8-8
TLO Idaho ................... 85 .......... .700 7-9
Coeurd'Alene J . ......... 84 .......... .700 6-10
Xpert DBA ................... 82 .......... .721 4-12
Bil522 .......................... 81 .......... .681 3-13
Walla Walla Dawg ...... 78 .......... .684 0-16

Yeah, JP would almost have to go 0-for the rest of the season to drop to .681 and, I'd rather he got hot.
Getting to 91 wins is feasible if my GT win streak were to continue , BUT, seattlefan-daBronx and techmc, who both also picked 91
(both buttholes because I picked 91 first so that's MY number signed, Karen) wins stand to be closer to JP's OPS than me.

GO MARINERS!!!!!!

I would be ecstatic if I lose the tie breaker because that means they went 12-3 to finish it out

You have a good attitude, tehmc!

[DavidGee24]

Who are those boneheads who had them winning well over 90 games, especially the one who picked them to win 97. What the hell was HE smoking?

[bpj]

Who are those boneheads who had them winning well over 90 games, especially the one who picked them to win 97. What the hell was HE smoking?

Serves us right for trying to be optimistic

[MarinerFan4Life]

DT, did I do something bad to get dropped from the list? I didn't think I was that much of a troublemaker...

[Donn Beach]

Teams that win 54% for an entire decade don't win 54% every single year. Some years there lower and some years they pop and are higher. Its those pop years when you have the best chance of winning it all. 54% should not be your goal at the beginning of the year. Since the year 2000 World Series champions have averaged 94.7 wins for a .585 winning percentage. The only team to win a world series below .540 was the Cardinals in 2006.

which i pretty much verbatim what dipoto said in the first place. My point is people construe 54% as being mediocre when in fact its a pretty good season as well as a pretty good decade. that's the thing about baseball, there isn't a lot of winning to be done in the first place

[D-train]

DT, did I do something bad to get dropped from the list? I didn't think I was that much of a troublemaker...

Could you go back to the thread in the section above and find yourself and let me know where you are? Thanks!

[D-train]

Teams that win 54% for an entire decade don't win 54% every single year. Some years there lower and some years they pop and are higher. Its those pop years when you have the best chance of winning it all. 54% should not be your goal at the beginning of the year. Since the year 2000 World Series champions have averaged 94.7 wins for a .585 winning percentage. The only team to win a world series below .540 was the Cardinals in 2006.

which i pretty much verbatim what dipoto said in the first place. My point is people construe 54% as being mediocre when in fact its a pretty good season as well as a pretty good decade. that's the thing about baseball, there isn't a lot of winning to be done in the first place

There is definitely not a lot of winning by teams the have never been to the WS or that have 20+ year playoff droughts.

[rockycola]

Yeah, JP would almost have to go 0-for the rest of the season to drop to .681 and, I'd rather he got hot.
Getting to 91 wins is feasible if my GT win streak were to continue , BUT, seattlefan-daBronx and techmc, who both also picked 91
(both buttholes because I picked 91 first so that's MY number signed, Karen) wins stand to be closer to JP's OPS than me.

GO MARINERS!!!!!!

I would be ecstatic if I lose the tie breaker because that means they went 12-3 to finish it out

You have a good attitude, tehmc!

[Donn Beach]

which i pretty much verbatim what dipoto said in the first place. My point is people construe 54% as being mediocre when in fact its a pretty good season as well as a pretty good decade. that's the thing about baseball, there isn't a lot of winning to be done in the first place

There is definitely not a lot of winning by teams the have never been to the WS or that have 20+ year playoff droughts.

my point is there isn't a lot of winning for teams that do make the playoffs generally either, I really find it kind of fascinating. 54% is BS, that's 88 wins? What about 92 wins? That gets to be considered a successful season doesn't it? So the difference between success and mediocrity is four wins over a 162 game season. There's something about that i find crazy

[rockycola]

DT, did I do something bad to get dropped from the list? I didn't think I was that much of a troublemaker...

Could you go back to the thread in the section above and find yourself and let me know where you are? Thanks!

I found it on page 8 of the thread. Page 9 showed his name within the whole list of protagonists.
~

MarinerFan4Life.jpg (12.64 KiB) Viewed 29 times