Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 15368
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:28 pm

douche wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:24 pm
Yes, their SOS was weak (0.429). 30th in the league.


schedule.jpg
Why use 2024 records? This was the 2025 season. :?

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 78871
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by D-train » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:34 pm

douche wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:12 pm
Is there a way to change my board name to 'absurd'? :D
I think it is perfect how it is. Just kidding!! lol
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 78871
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by D-train » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:35 pm

douche wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:24 pm
Yes, their SOS was weak (0.429). 30th in the league.


schedule.jpg
But that was their 2024 records. A lot of the teams they played were worse this season than last season.
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 78871
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by D-train » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:36 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:28 pm
douche wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:24 pm
Yes, their SOS was weak (0.429). 30th in the league.


schedule.jpg
Why use 2024 records? This was the 2025 season. :?
That was likely from the beginning of this season.
dt

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 15368
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:38 pm

ESPN power index with SoS...

Screenshot_20260126_123337_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20260126_123337_Chrome.jpg (200.73 KiB) Viewed 43 times

DavidGee24
Posts: 10130
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by DavidGee24 » Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:48 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:38 pm
ESPN power index with SoS...


Screenshot_20260126_123337_Chrome.jpg
Not surprised to see the Lions high up there as they never looked like a bad team, but the Packers had some AWFUL games this season.

After seeing that graphic, we'd BETTER stomp the Patriots.

User avatar
seattlefan-daBronx
Posts: 15812
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by seattlefan-daBronx » Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:21 pm

"What we just accomplished - beating the Niners, (then the Panthers), then the Lambs, then the niners again, then the Lambs again, and won them all. That is an absolute fucking marvel. No team in the NFL could pull that off and I don't think the enormity of that accomplishment of that string of wins can be adequately expressed - that is The Gauntlet of all Gauntlets".

Exactly.

No one can ever say we cheated our way to the Superbowl for sure. How important was home field advantage in the playoffs?!?!

The real 12s understand what this squad just went through. Last night was our Superbowl. And victory is oh so sweet!
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass

Michael K.
Posts: 13997
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by Michael K. » Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:28 pm

The 9ers were actually back to back for us. Last game of the regular season, then we had a Bye, then we beat them again. Crazy shit. Has to just EAT the 9er fans alive.

DavidGee24
Posts: 10130
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by DavidGee24 » Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:34 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:28 pm
The 9ers were actually back to back for us. Last game of the regular season, then we had a Bye, then we beat them again. Crazy shit. Has to just EAT the 9er fans alive.
Eight quarters and zero touchdowns. We made them look like the 1992 Seahawks.

User avatar
douche
Posts: 2852
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:41 pm

Re: Postmortem: NFCCG / Real SB: Sea v Lambs

Post by douche » Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:49 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 8:28 pm
douche wrote:
Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:24 pm
Yes, their SOS was weak (0.429). 30th in the league.


schedule.jpg
Why use 2024 records? This was the 2025 season. :?
The article is dated August 6, 2025 for this season. Strength of schedule is determined by the previous season's (2024) opponent's record and outlines how many previous (2024) opponents were playoff teams. Wouldn't one have to consider the previous season's standings (data) in an attempt to determine the strength of schedule for this season?

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/459 ... m-rankings
Last edited by douche on Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply