I do admit that it's true, but not that it is the only, or even necessarily the biggest, determinent in the observed disparity.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:50 pmit doesn't shed doubt on anything, what it does is confirm that blacks are indeed pulled over more often than whites based on color, something that they have complained about but hadn't been acknowledged. You seem to not be willing to admit that its true but that blacks complain about it more than they should, which makes no sense to me
Since the article didn't say how large that drop was it's impossible to determine how much it played a role in the overall disparity.The study's authors acknowledged that basing this disparity on bias is hard to do in a statistically significant way, so they also analyzed the data using what they called the "veil of darkness" test. Essentially, they looked at the racial breakdown of only the traffic stops made after dark, when the race of a motorist is harder to discern.
Even when applied to different subsets of data, the results "[showed] a marked drop in the proportion of drivers stopped after dusk who are black, suggestive of discrimination in stop decisions."
What i am saying is that even if racial bias accounted for the entire disparity, it is not close to being big enough to justify sweeping statements about our police forces with regard to racial attitudes. Based on the anecdotes one would think the disparity was 200% rather than 20% and insofar as they are the product of exaggeration and outright lying they are extremely irresponsible and destructive.